LPV gain-scheduled control of SCR aftertreatment systems

Hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and some of other polluting emissions produced by diesel engines are usually lower than those produced by gasoline engines. While great strides have been made in the exhaust aftertreatment of vehicular pollutants, the elimination of nitrogen oxide (NO x ) from diesel vehicles is still a challenge. The primary reason is that diesel combustion is a fuel-lean process, and hence there is significant unreacted oxygen in the exhaust. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a well-developed technology for power plants and has been recently employed for reducing NO x emissions from automotive sources and in particular, heavy-duty diesel engines. In this article, we develop a linear parameter-varying (LPV) feedforward/feedback control design method for the SCR aftertreatment system to decrease NO x emissions while keeping ammonia slippage to a desired low level downstream the catalyst. The performance of the closed-loop system obtained from the interconnection of the SCR system and the output feedback LPV control strategy is then compared with other control design methods including sliding mode, and observer-based static state-feedback parameter-varying control. To reduce the computational complexity involved in the control design process, the number of LPV parameters in the developed quasi-LPV (qLPV) model is reduced by applying the principal component analysis technique. An LPV feedback/feedforward controller is then designed for the qLPV model with reduced number of scheduling parameters. The designed full-order controller is further simplified to a first-order transfer function with a parameter-varying gain and pole. Finally, simulation results using both a low-order model and a high-fidelity and high-order model of SCR reactions in GT-POWER interfaced with MATLAB/SIMULINK illustrate the high NO x conversion efficiency of the closed-loop SCR system using the proposed parameter-varying control law.

[1]  M. Elsener,et al.  Urea-SCR: a promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines , 2000 .

[2]  Gordon G. Parker,et al.  Model-Based Estimation and Control System Development in a Urea-SCR Aftertreatment System , 2008 .

[3]  Michael P. Harold,et al.  Analysis of Periodic Storage and Reduction of NOx in Catalytic Monoliths , 2005 .

[4]  Christopher H. Onder,et al.  Control of an SCR catalytic converter system for a mobile heavy-duty application , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[5]  Devesh Upadhyay,et al.  Modeling of a Urea SCR Catalyst With Automotive Applications , 2002 .

[6]  P. Gahinet,et al.  Affine parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions and real parametric uncertainty , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[7]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[8]  Timothy V. Johnson,et al.  Review of diesel emissions and control , 2009 .

[9]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A convex characterization of gain-scheduled H∞ controllers , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Junmin Wang,et al.  An extended Kalman filter for NOx sensor ammonia cross-sensitivity elimination in selective catalytic reduction applications , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[11]  J. N. Chi,et al.  Modeling and Control of a Urea-SCR Aftertreatment System , 2005 .

[12]  Pio Forzatti,et al.  Adequacy of lumped parameter models for SCR reactors with monolith structure , 1992 .

[13]  Junmin Wang,et al.  An extended Kalman filter for ammonia coverage ratio and capacity estimations in the application of Diesel engine SCR control and onboard diagnosis , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[14]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  E. Tronconi,et al.  NH3–NO/NO2 chemistry over V-based catalysts and its role in the mechanism of the Fast SCR reaction , 2006 .

[16]  Herbert Werner,et al.  PCA-Based Parameter Set Mappings for LPV Models With Fewer Parameters and Less Overbounding , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Fpt Frank Willems,et al.  Is Closed-Loop SCR Control Required to Meet Future Emission Targets? , 2007 .

[18]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Research on gain scheduling , 2000, Autom..

[19]  Michiel J. Van Nieuwstadt,et al.  Model Based Analysis and Control Design of a Urea-SCR deNOx Aftertreatment System , 2006 .

[20]  V. Balakotaiah,et al.  Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 on iron zeolite monolithic catalysts: Steady-state and transient kinetics , 2011 .

[21]  Mark A. Shost,et al.  Model Based Control of SCR Dosing and OBD Strategies with Feedback from NH 3 Sensors , 2009 .

[22]  Junmin Wang,et al.  Diesel Engine Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Ammonia Surface Coverage Control Using a Computationally-Efficient Model Predictive Control Assisted Method , 2009 .

[23]  John H. Johnson,et al.  Adequacy of reduced order models for model-based control in a urea-SCR aftertreatment system , 2008 .

[24]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[25]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Gain-Scheduled Missile Autopilot Design Using Linear Parameter Varying Transformations , 1993 .