Virtual arm׳s reach influences perceived distances but only after experience reaching

Considerable empirical evidence has shown influences of the action capabilities of the body on the perception of sizes and distances. Generally, as one's action capabilities increase, the perception of the relevant distance (over which the action is to be performed) decreases and vice versa. As a consequence, it has been proposed that the body's action capabilities act as a perceptual ruler, which is used to measure perceived sizes and distances. In this set of studies, we investigated this hypothesis by assessing the influence of arm's reach on the perception of distance. By providing participant with a self-representing avatar seen in a first-person perspective in virtual reality, we were able to introduce novel and completely unfamiliar alterations in the virtual arm's reach to evaluate their impact on perceived distance. Using both action-based and visual matching measures, we found that virtual arm's reach influenced perceived distance in virtual environments. Due to the participants' inexperience with the reach alterations, we also were able to assess the amount of experience with the new arm's reach required to influence perceived distance. We found that minimal experience reaching with the virtual arm can influence perceived distance. However, some reaching experience is required. Merely having a long or short virtual arm, even one that is synchronized to one's movements, is not enough to influence distance perception if one has no experience reaching.

[1]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  J. Witt.  Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. Marshall,et al.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.

[4]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Uwe Kloos,et al.  Egocentric distance judgments in a large screen display immersive virtual environment , 2010, APGV '10.

[6]  Mel Slater,et al.  Human Tails: Ownership and Control of Extended Humanoid Avatars , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Alice C. Roy,et al.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  T. Schormann,et al.  Activation in the Ipsilateral Posterior Parietal Cortex during Tool Use: A PET Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Slater,et al.  Multisensory Stimulation Can Induce an Illusion of Larger Belly Size in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Extending Body Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Very Long Arm Illusion , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Verónica C. Ramenzoni,et al.  Illusory Shrinkage and Growth , 2010, Psychological science.

[14]  Travis Rasor,et al.  Distance perception in virtual environments: a closer look at the horizon and the error , 2009, APGV '09.

[15]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Welcome to Wonderland: The Influence of the Size and Shape of a Virtual Hand On the Perceived Size and Shape of Virtual Objects , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[18]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[20]  Reply to Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein , 2006, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[21]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Influence of Motor Planning on Distance Perception within the Peripersonal Space , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2009, TAP.

[23]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[27]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments , 2005, TAP.

[30]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[31]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Short article: Carrying the height of the world on your ankles: Encumbering observers reduces estimates of how high an actor can jump , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[33]  John W Philbeck,et al.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  F. Durgin,et al.  Sugar and space? Not the case: Effects of low blood glucose on slant estimation are mediated by beliefs , 2013, i-Perception.

[35]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Neuroimaging reveals enhanced activation in a reach-selective brain area for objects located within participants’ typical hand workspaces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[38]  H. Pick,et al.  Visual capture produced by prism spectacles , 1965 .

[39]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression , 2013 .

[40]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Effect of Viewing a Self-Avatar on Distance Judgments in an HMD-Based Virtual Environment , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[43]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The plasticity of near space: Evidence for contraction , 2009, Cognition.

[45]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[46]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[47]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[48]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  A. Cowey,et al.  Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Massimiliano Di Luca.  New Method to Measure End-to-End Delay of Virtual Reality , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[51]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? , 2003, NeuroImage.

[52]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[53]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Does Energy Expenditure Affect the Perception of Egocentric Distance? A Failure to Replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) , 2006, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[54]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .