Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.

OBJECTIVE To describe incorrect surgical procedures reported from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Centers from 2001 to mid-2006 and provide proposed solutions for preventing such events. DESIGN Descriptive study. SETTING Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS Veterans of the US Armed Forces. INTERVENTIONS The VHA instituted an initial directive, "Ensuring Correct Surgery and Invasive Procedures," in January 2003. The directive was updated in 2004 to include non-operating room (OR) invasive procedures and incorporated requirements of The Joint Commission Universal Protocol for preventing wrong-site operations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The categories included 5 incorrect event types (wrong patient, side, site, procedure, or implant), major or minor surgical procedures, location in or out of the OR, therapeutic or diagnostic events, adverse event or close call, inpatient or ambulatory events, specialty department, body segment, and severity and probability of harm. RESULTS We reviewed 342 reported events (212 adverse events and 130 close calls). Of these, 108 adverse events (50.9%) occurred in an OR, and 104 (49.1%) occurred elsewhere. When examining adverse events only, ophthalmology and invasive radiology were the specialties associated with the most reports (45 [21.2%] each), whereas orthopedics was second to ophthalmology for number of reported adverse events occurring in the OR. Pulmonary medicine cases (such as wrong-side thoracentesis) and wrong-site cases (such as wrong spinal level) were associated with the most harm. The most common root cause of events was communication (21.0%). CONCLUSIONS Incorrect ophthalmic and orthopedic surgical procedures appear to be overrepresented among adverse events occurring in ORs. Outside the OR, adverse events by invasive radiology were most frequently reported. Incorrect surgical procedures are not only an OR challenge but also a challenge for events occurring outside of the OR. We support earlier communication based on crew resource management to prevent surgical adverse events.

[1]  F. Grover,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[2]  J Gosbee,et al.  Developing and deploying a patient safety program in a large health care delivery system: you can't fix what you don't know about. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[3]  Nancy M Saufl,et al.  Universal protocol for preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong person surgery. , 2004, Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses.

[4]  James T. Reason,et al.  Safety in the operating theatre – Part 2: Human error and organisational failure , 2005 .

[5]  Patient safety: what is really at issue? , 2005, Frontiers of health services management.

[6]  Mary R. Kwaan,et al.  Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[7]  S. Seiden,et al.  Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable? , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[8]  James P Bagian,et al.  Medical team training: applying crew resource management in the Veterans Health Administration. , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[9]  J. Simon,et al.  Surgical confusions in ophthalmology. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Thiessen,et al.  Wrong-Side/Wrong-Site, Wrong-Procedure, and Wrong Patient Adverse Events: Are They Preventable? , 2007 .

[11]  Janet Johnston,et al.  Getting Surgery Right , 2007, Annals of surgery.