Evaluation of Burn Rounds Using Telemedicine: Perspectives from Patients, Families, and Burn Center Staff.

INTRODUCTION Burn care requires multiple disciplines to collaborate to achieve best patient care. Because of this, rounds involve a very large burn team to assess patients' wounds and formulate plans. To decrease the amount of team members on rounds, our burn center implemented a new budding technology: telemedicine. We created "Zoom Rounds," a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant, secure videoconferencing system to relay patient wound evaluations to a remote conference room where team members can participate digitally. We sought to evaluate this new rounding process by querying the burn team, patients, and families regarding their experience. METHODS Surveys were developed for each group and were distributed over a 2-month period. Respondents were asked to rate the videoconferencing rounding experience and comment on the educational experience (staff/providers) and one's personal experience (patient/family). We analyzed both the quantitative data with the qualitative responses. Qualitative data analysis for content was used to independently code and analyze responses to the open-ended survey questions by two authors and verified by adjudication review. RESULTS Thirty-three patients/families and 69 burn staff members completed the confidential survey (response rate of 90% and 83%, respectively). Coded responses identified several themes: inconsistent technology, improved visualization and communication regarding the wounds, better learning experience, and improved patient experience by decreased crowds in the room. CONCLUSIONS There was strong support for the use of videoconferencing for patient wound rounds among providers, burn center staff, and patients/families. Telemedicine is a promising technology to improve inpatient burn rounds.

[1]  N. Noviski,et al.  Parent Participation in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Rounds via Telemedicine: Feasibility and Impact , 2017, The Journal of pediatrics.

[2]  E. Krupinski,et al.  American Telemedicine Association Guidelines for Teleburn. , 2017, Telemedicine journal and e-health.

[3]  Christine A. Sinsky,et al.  From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  Michael J. Holcomb,et al.  Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. , 2014, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Berwick,et al.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost. , 2008, Health affairs.

[6]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  J. Fish,et al.  An initial experience with telemedicine in follow-up burn care. , 2002, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[8]  N. Demartines,et al.  Assessment of telemedicine in surgical education and patient care. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[9]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  L. Gruppen,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy of interactive videoconferencing in residency and continuing education , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.