The relationship between speech perception and auditory organisation : studies with spectrally reduced speech.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Pinker,et al. Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. , 1978, Canadian journal of psychology.
[2] R. M. Warren,et al. Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[3] R. B. Gardner,et al. Perceptual grouping of formants with static and dynamic differences in fundamental frequency , 1989 .
[4] Linda B. Smith,et al. The role of phonemes and syllables in the perceived similarity of speech sounds for children , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[5] Daniel Reisberg,et al. On the Perception of Interleaved Melodies , 1995 .
[6] J A Bashford,et al. Spectral restoration of speech: Intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] C. Darwin,et al. Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] T. C. Rand,et al. Dichotic release from masking for speech , 1974 .
[10] B. Moore,et al. Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as separate tones in harmonic complexes. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[12] R B Gardner,et al. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] C. M. Marin,et al. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] S. Arlinger,et al. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[15] N. Sutherland,et al. Grouping Frequency Components of Vowels: When is a Harmonic not a Harmonic? , 1984 .
[16] G L Dannenbring,et al. Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. , 1976, Canadian journal of psychology.
[17] K N Stevens. ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES USED FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[18] R. Cole,et al. Perception of temporal order in speech: the role of vowel transitions. , 1973, Canadian journal of psychology.
[19] Harvey b. Fletcher,et al. Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .
[20] A S Bregman,et al. The effects of auditory streaming on duplex perception , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] A. Bregman,et al. The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[22] S. McAdams. Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Richard F. Lyon,et al. A perceptual pitch detector , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[24] Stuart Anstis,et al. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency-modulated tones. , 1985 .
[25] K. Stevens. Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] J. Culling,et al. Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Gary L. Dannenbring,et al. The effect of continuity on auditory stream segregation , 1973 .
[28] G. A. Miller,et al. The Trill Threshold , 1950 .
[29] D. Pisoni. Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.
[30] Peter Ladefoged,et al. On the Fusion of Sounds Reaching Different Sense Organs , 1957 .
[31] C. Darwin,et al. On the Dynamic Use of Prosody in Speech Perception , 1975 .
[32] S Buus,et al. Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Q Summerfield,et al. Use of Visual Information for Phonetic Perception , 1979, Phonetica.
[34] J W Hall,et al. Perceptual organization in a comodulation masking release interference paradigm: exploring the role of amplitude modulation, frequency modulation, and harmonicity. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Guy J. Brown,et al. Computational auditory scene analysis , 1994, Comput. Speech Lang..
[36] Phil D. Green,et al. Some solution to the missing feature problem in data classification, with application to noise robust ASR , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).
[37] John F. Culling,et al. Speech perception seen through the ear , 1989, Speech Commun..
[38] K. Stevens,et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.
[39] Martin Cooke,et al. Modelling auditory processing and organisation , 1993, Distinguished dissertations in computer science.
[40] Gunnar Fant,et al. Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .
[41] D. Pisoni,et al. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.
[42] B C Moore,et al. Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[43] B C Moore,et al. Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al. Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .
[46] Dennis H. Klatt,et al. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .
[47] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[48] R. Carlyon,et al. Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al. Contributions of prosody to speech perception , 1976 .
[50] Phil D. Green,et al. Handling missing data in speech recognition , 1994, ICSLP.
[51] A S Bregman,et al. Auditory streaming is cumulative. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] H. McGurk,et al. Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.
[53] Albert S. Bregman. Psychological data and computational ASA , 1998 .
[54] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] L. Demany,et al. The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] A S Bregman,et al. Propagation of constraints in auditory organization , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[57] E. Cudahy,et al. Effects of a contralateral interference tone on auditory recognition , 1974 .
[58] R. Carlyon,et al. The psychophysics of concurrent sound segregation. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[59] B. Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .
[60] M. Wertheimer. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .
[61] B. Moore,et al. Vowel identification based on amplitude modulation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[62] T D Carrell,et al. The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[63] B. Moore,et al. Temporal window shape as a function of frequency and level. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] D. Broadbent,et al. Perception of Sequence in Auditory Events , 1960 .
[66] Phil D. Green,et al. Missing data techniques for robust speech recognition , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[67] R Drullman,et al. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[68] C. Darwin,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time , 2022 .
[69] P E Rubin,et al. On the perception of speech from time-varying acoustic information: Contributions of amplitude variation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[70] Richard Lippmann,et al. Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy , 1996, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[71] Peter D. Eimas,et al. Organization in the Perception of Speech by Young Infants , 1992 .
[72] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[73] Q. Summerfield. Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. , 1987 .
[74] A. Treisman. Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .
[75] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[76] Jont B. Allen,et al. ASA Edition of Speech and Hearing in Communication , 1996 .
[77] R B Gardner,et al. Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: Absence of effects on phonemic categorization , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[78] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. THE INFLUENCE OF EXTRANEOUS SOUNDS ON THE PERCEPTUAL ESTIMATION OF FIRST-FORMANT FREQUENCY IN VOWELS UNDER CONDITIONS OF ASYNCHRONY , 1991 .
[79] Further investigation into the influence of preceding liquids on stop consonant perception , 1981 .
[80] J. L. Miller,et al. On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[81] A M Liberman,et al. Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[82] H. McGurk,et al. Visual influences on speech perception processes , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.
[83] C. Darwin,et al. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[84] A S Bregman,et al. Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[85] D D Dirks,et al. Masking effects of speech competing messages. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[86] Phil D. Green,et al. Auditory scene analysis and hidden Markov model recognition of speech in noise , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[87] P E Rubin,et al. On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[88] U. Tilmann Zwicker,et al. Auditory recognition of diotic and dichotic vowel pairs , 1984, Speech Commun..
[89] J. Culling,et al. Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[90] B Rakerd,et al. Evidence of Talker-Independent Information for Vowels , 1986, Language and speech.
[91] L. L. Elliott. Development of auditory narrow-band frequency contours. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[92] Patti Price,et al. The DARPA 1000-word resource management database for continuous speech recognition , 1988, ICASSP-88., International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[93] J. Driver. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading , 1996, Nature.
[94] A. Liberman,et al. Some experiments on the sound of silence in phonetic perception. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[95] L. V. Noorden. Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .
[96] J. Cutting. Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. , 1976, Psychological review.