Walk, Look, Remember: The Influence of the Gallery’s Spatial Layout on Human Memory for an Art Exhibition

The spatial organisation of museums and its influence on the visitor experience has been the subject of numerous studies. Previous research, despite reporting some actual behavioural correlates, rarely had the possibility to investigate the cognitive processes of the art viewers. In the museum context, where spatial layout is one of the most powerful curatorial tools available, attention and memory can be measured as a means of establishing whether or not the gallery fulfils its function as a space for contemplating art. In this exploratory experiment, 32 participants split into two groups explored an experimental, non-public exhibition and completed two unanticipated memory tests afterwards. The results show that some spatial characteristics of an exhibition can inhibit the recall of pictures and shift the focus to perceptual salience of the artworks.

[1]  Ipek Kaynar,et al.  Visibility, movement paths and preferences in open plan museums: An observational and descriptive study of the Ann Arbor Hands-on Museum , 2005 .

[2]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[3]  Kali Tzortzi,et al.  MUSEUM BUILDING DESIGN AND EXHIBITION LAYOUT , 2007 .

[4]  V. Newhouse.  Art and the power of placement , 2005 .

[5]  C. Dorsett.  Making meaning beyond display , 2010 .

[6]  Mahbub Rashid,et al.  Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning , 2010 .

[7]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[8]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[9]  L. Carlson,et al.  Selecting landmarks in novel environments , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Signage Legibility Distances as a Function of Observation Angle , 2007 .

[11]  Brian O'Doherty,et al.  Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space , 1986 .

[12]  B. Serrell.  Paying Attention: The Duration and Allocation of Visitors' Time in Museum Exhibitions , 1997 .

[13]  Jörg Müller,et al.  Screenfinity: extending the perception area of content on very large public displays , 2013, CHI.

[14]  Wolfgang Tschacher,et al.  An Integrative and Comprehensive Methodology for Studying Aesthetic Experience in the Field , 2014 .

[15]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space Syntax: The Language of Museum Space , 2006 .

[16]  Rul von Stülpnagel,et al.  Can active navigation be as good as driving? A comparison of spatial memory in drivers and backseat drivers. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[17]  R. Whelan.  Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[18]  Paul Locher.  Contemporary experimental aesthetics: State of the art technology , 2011, i-Perception.

[19]  Chase O'Black.  Strike a Pose , 2012 .

[20]  Ruth Dalton,et al.  Spatial Predictors of Eye Movement in a Gallery Setting , 2013 .

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  Jean Wineman,et al.  Exploring, Engaging, Understanding in Museums , 2006 .

[23]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Measuring environments for public displays: a space syntax approach , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space , 1993, COSIT.

[25]  R. Dalton,et al.  Walk, look, remember:Art galleries as spaces facilitating memory , 2013 .

[26]  D. R. Montello.  A New Framework for Understanding the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in Large-Scale Environments , 1998 .

[27]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Isovist Analysis Captures Properties of Space Relevant for Locomotion and Experience , 2007, Perception.

[28]  Martin Tröndle,et al.  Experiencing Exhibitions: A Review of Studies on Visitor Experiences in Museums , 2012 .

[29]  Yi Lu,et al.  Exhibition Visitors are Sensitive to Patterns of Display Covisibility , 2014 .

[30]  John Peponis,et al.  The spatial construction of seeing at Castelvecchio , 2003 .

[32]  Andrew Hollingworth.  Visual Memory for Natural Scenes , 2008 .

[33]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  From Objects to Landmarks: The Function of Visual Location Information in Spatial Navigation , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[34]  Y K Choi.  The Morphology of Exploration and Encounter in Museum Layouts , 1999 .

[35]  B. Tatler,et al.  Looking and Acting: Vision and eye movements in natural behaviour , 2009 .

[36]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[38]  M. Baxandall,et al.  Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display , 1991 .

[39]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Tate Gallery, Millbank: a study of the existing layout and new masterplan proposal , 1996 .

[40]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  S. Bitgood,et al.  AN ATTENTION-VALUE MODEL OF MUSEUM VISITORS , 2010 .

[42]  Maximilian Schwalm,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge , 2006 .

[43]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[44]  Michael O'Neill.  Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on wayfinding in simulated buildings , 1992 .

[45]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Memory for object location and route direction in virtual large-scale space , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[47]  Petra Jansen-Osmann,et al.  Is Route Learning More Than Serial Learning? , 2008, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[48]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  The Role of Global and Local Landmarks in Virtual Environment Navigation , 2000, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..

[49]  Sabine Timpf,et al.  On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.