Ideal Types Of Sport and Wellness Technology Users

A demand exists for the increasing understanding of consumers’ motives and habits related to exercising and the influence of sport and wellness technology on everyday lives. This study aims to shred light to the different types of users of sport and wellness technology by examining the influential aspects of sport and wellness technology and gamification. By thematically analyzing data from 16 indepth interviews, one group interview, and one set of observation, the study highlights the unique characteristics of the sport and wellness technology users by grouping them into ideal types that represents data as extensively as possible. An ideal type is an analytical construct to ascertain deviations and similarities of concrete cases in an individual phenomenon. This study discovered five ideal types of sport and wellness technology users: On-Off Exercisers, Confidence Seekers, Intrinsic Exercisers, Performance Improvers, and Sport Addicts. The formed ideal types are the main theoretical contribution of this study. The main practical contribution follows from suggesting the characteristics of sport and wellness technologies that are most important for each ideal type and the related gamification aspects. The providers of these technologies can utilize these insights in determining the technologies most suitable for each ideal type.

[1]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[2]  P. Koski.  Physical Activity Relationship (PAR) , 2008 .

[3]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[4]  Markus Makkonen,et al.  To Gamify or Not to Gamify? Gamification in Exercise Applications and Its Role in Impacting Exercise Motivation , 2016, Bled eConference.

[5]  Staffan Björk,et al.  Designing gamification: creating gameful and playful experiences , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[6]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[7]  Pablo Paredes.  Design Principles for the Conceptualization of Games for Health Behavior Change , 2013 .

[8]  Maximilian Weber,et al.  Die "Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher undsozialpolitischer Erkenntnis , 1904 .

[9]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[10]  A. Bandura.  Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory , 1998 .

[11]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[12]  Kenneth Nyberg,et al.  Sociology , 2002, Encyclopedia of Information Systems.

[13]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[14]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[15]  Hanna Vehmas,et al.  The essence of wellbeing tourism : case Peurunka , 2015 .

[16]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Player Types: A Meta-synthesis , 2014, Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc..

[17]  R. Enskat.  Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie , 2011 .

[18]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[19]  Jarno Ojala,et al.  Understanding social needs and motivations to share data in online sports communities , 2010, MindTrek.

[20]  Stephen Kalberg.  Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology Today: Major Themes, Mode of Causal Analysis, and Applications , 2012 .

[21]  D. Unruh,et al.  Characteristics And Types Of Participation In Social Worlds , 1979 .

[22]  Dirk Käsler.  Max Weber : Eine Einführung in Leben, Werk und Wirkung , 1998 .

[23]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2013, CHI 2013.