Urban Scaling of Cities in the Netherlands

We investigated the socioeconomic scaling behavior of all cities with more than 50,000 inhabitants in the Netherlands and found significant superlinear scaling of the gross urban product with population size. Of these cities, 22 major cities have urban agglomerations and urban areas defined by the Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics. For these major cities we investigated the superlinear scaling for three separate modalities: the cities defined as municipalities, their urban agglomerations and their urban areas. We find superlinearity with power-law exponents of around 1.15. But remarkably, both types of agglomerations underperform if we compare for the same size of population an agglomeration with a city as a municipality. In other words, an urban system as one formal municipality performs better as compared to an urban agglomeration with the same population size. This effect is larger for the second type of agglomerations, the urban areas. We think this finding has important implications for urban policy, in particular municipal reorganizations. A residual analysis suggests that cities with a municipal reorganization recently and in the past decades have a higher probability to perform better than cities without municipal restructuring.

[1]  D. Pumain Scaling laws and urban systems , 2004 .

[2]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  On Scaling of Scientific Knowledge Production in U.S. Metropolitan Areas , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  D. Pumain,et al.  An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws Une théorie évolutive pour expliquer les lois d'échelle dans les systèmes de villes , 2006 .

[4]  V. Latora,et al.  Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Juval Portugali,et al.  Complexity theories of cities have come of age : an overview with implications to urban planning and design , 2012 .

[6]  Richard Van Noorden Love thy lab neighbour , 2010 .

[7]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Urban Systems Dynamics, Urban Growth and Scaling Laws: The Question of Ergodicity , 2012 .

[8]  J. Hyman,et al.  Scaling laws for the movement of people between locations in a large city. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Joachim Mathiesen,et al.  Scaling properties of European research units , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  N. S. Barnett,et al.  Private communication , 1969 .

[11]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Urban characteristics attributable to density-driven tie formation , 2012, Nature Communications.

[12]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Supplementary Materials for The Origins of Scaling in Cities , 2013 .

[13]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and the Production Function for Cities , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Anthony F. J. van Raan Performance-related differences of bibliometric statistical properties of research groups: Cumulative advantages and hierarchically layered networks , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .

[16]  G. Galster,et al.  Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept , 2001 .

[17]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Does Collocation Inform the Impact of Collaboration? , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Samuel Arbesman,et al.  Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Zbigniew Smoreda,et al.  The scaling of human interactions with city size , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Localization and centrality in networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Hyejin Youn,et al.  The hypothesis of urban scaling: formalization, implications and challenges , 2013, 1301.5919.

[23]  Gordon F. Mulligan,et al.  Central place theory and its reemergence in regional science , 2012 .

[24]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Universities Scale Like Cities , 2012, ArXiv.

[25]  Robert Sandy,et al.  Statistics for Business and Economics , 1989 .

[26]  Michael Batty,et al.  A Theory of City Size , 2013, Science.

[27]  A. Alderson,et al.  Power and Position in the World City System1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  M. Batty,et al.  Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[30]  Richard van Noorden Love thy lab neighbour. , 2010, Nature.

[31]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  R. Florida Cities and the Creative Class , 2003 .