Assessing the Impact of Mission Requirements, Vehicle Attributes, Technologies and Uncertainty in Rotorcraft System Design

This research provides a probabilistic design environment for the propagation of design uncertainty to the system level to assist in making more educated decisions in the early stages of design. This design uncertainty is associated with the key elements that are addressed in system design and which are captured in the appropriate design environment, namely mission requirements, vehicle attributes and technologies. The proposed environments are constructed using a metamodeling technique called Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and provide a model relating system-level responses to the mission requirements, vehicle attributes and technologies. The Mission Space Model is concerned with mission requirements exclusively and provides the ability to model an infinite set of missions. The Unified Tradeoff Environment (UTE) integrates the mission requirements, vehicle attributes and technologies in a single environment while allowing both deterministic and probabilistic analyses. The design environments and design methods proposed in this research are demonstrated for a rotorcraft of current interest, namely the Future Transport Rotorcraft, and probabilistic applications are presented.

[1]  Floyd Usry,et al.  Overarching Rotorcraft Commonality Assessment , 2000 .

[2]  Michelle R. Kirby,et al.  A Methodology for Technology Identification, Evaluation, and Selection in Conceptual and Prelimina , 2001 .

[3]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Application of Probabilistic Methods for the Determination of an Economically Robust HSCT Configuration , 1996 .

[4]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[5]  George Ellwood Dieter,et al.  Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach , 1983 .

[6]  Daniel DeLaurentis.  A probabilistic approach to aircraft design emphasizing stability and control uncertainties , 1998 .

[7]  G. Hazelrigg.  Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design , 1996 .

[8]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  An Application of a Technology Impact Forecasting (TIF) Method to an Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicle , 1999 .

[9]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Technology Infusion and Resource Allocation for a Civil Tiltrotor , 2000 .

[10]  J. Kleijnen.  Statistical tools for simulation practitioners , 1986 .

[11]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Comparison of Two Probabilistic Techniques for the Assessment of Economic Uncertainty , 1997 .

[12]  Anet,et al.  A CONCEPT EXPLORATION METHOD FOR DETERMINING ROBUST TOP-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS , 1997 .

[13]  B. Blanchard,et al.  Life-cycle cost and economic analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Daniel P. Schrage,et al.  Effect of Mission Requirements on the Economic Robustness of an HSCT Concept , 1997 .

[15]  Eric Fox,et al.  The Pratt & Whitney Probabilistic Design System , 1994 .

[16]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Reduced Order Guidance Methods and Probabilistic Techniques in Addressing Mission Uncertainty , 1996 .