Slipline field modeling of orthogonal machining for a worn tool with elastic effects and adhesion friction at the contact regions

Abstract In this paper, two slipline field models are presented for orthogonal machining with a worn tool with a finite flank wear land. Friction at tool–chip and tool–work piece interfaces are assumed to be governed by the adhesion friction law as suggested by [Maekawa, K., Kitagawa, T., Childs, T.H.C., 1997. Friction characteristics at chip–tool interface in steel machining. 23rd Leeds Lyon Symposium in Tribology] It is further assumed that the natural contact length consists of a zone of elastic contact and a zone of plastic contact such that the forces in the elastic contact region and those at the rigid-plastic chip boundary keep the chip in a state of static equilibrium. The relation between the angular range of α- and β-lines within the secondary shear zone is assumed to be given by the linear equation β = m0α. The fields are analyzed by the matrix operational procedure developed by [Dewhurst, P., Collins, I.F., 1973. A matrix methods for constructing slipline field solutions to a class of plain strain plasticity problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engineering 7, 357–378; Dewhurst, P., 1984. The Coulomb friction boundary value problem in plain-strain slipline field theory. In: First Int. Conf. on Technology of Plasticity (ICTP) Proc. (Advanced Technology of Plasticity), Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1085–1090; Dewhurst, P., 1985. A general matrix operator for linear boundary value problems in slip-line field theory. Int. J. Numer. Methods engineering 21, 169–182]. The limits of the validity of the proposed fields are established using Hill's overstressing criteria. Effect of flank wear on ploughing and cutting forces is studied and their variation with friction parameters examined. It is shown that the peak tool tip pressure for a worn tool is much lower than that for a sharp tool. The results of computation further demonstrate that the force ratio and average tool–chip Coulomb coefficient of friction for a sharp tool decrease with rake angle. But presence of even a small flank wear land may reverse this trend. The results from theoretical analysis are also compared with experiment.

[1]  S. Dundur.  Slipline Field Analysis of Deformation In Metal Machining with Worn Tool with Adhesion Friction in Contact Regions , 2005 .

[2]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Estimation of tool wear in orthogonal cutting using the finite element analysis , 2004 .

[3]  I. F. Collins,et al.  A matrix technique for constructing slip‐line field solutions to a class of plane strain plasticity problems , 1973 .

[4]  Rodney Hill,et al.  On the limits set by plastic yielding to the intensity of singularities of stress , 1954 .

[5]  H. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Photoelastic Analysis of Tool-Chip Interface Stresses , 1965 .

[6]  William J. Endres,et al.  A New Model and Analysis of Orthogonal Machining With an Edge-Radiused Tool , 2000 .

[7]  S. Kato,et al.  Stress Distribution at the Interface Between Tool and Chip in Machining , 1972 .

[8]  J. Mize.  Optimization Techniques With Fortran , 1973 .

[9]  Sounak Kumar Choudhury,et al.  Tool wear measurement in turning using force ratio , 2000 .

[10]  Shiv Gopal Kapoor,et al.  A Slip-Line Field for Ploughing During Orthogonal Cutting , 1997, Manufacturing Science and Engineering: Volume 2.

[11]  Yung C. Shin,et al.  Modeling of Tool Forces for Worn Tools: Flank Wear Effects , 1996 .

[12]  T. Shi,et al.  Slip-line solution for orthogonal cutting with a chip breaker and flank wear , 1991 .

[13]  T. Childs,et al.  Elastic effects in metal cutting chip formation , 1980 .

[14]  I. Yellowley,et al.  Stress distributions on the rake face during orthogonal machining , 1994 .

[15]  N. Fang.  Slip-line modeling of machining with a rounded-edge tool—Part I: new model and theory , 2003 .

[16]  E. G. Thomsen,et al.  Observations on the Angle Relationships in Metal Cutting , 1959 .

[17]  Chuanzhen Huang,et al.  The Effect of Tool Flank Wear on the Orthogonal Cutting Process and its Practical Implications , 2003 .

[18]  S T Dundur,et al.  Slipline field solutions for metal machining with adhesion friction and elastic effects at the chip-tool contact region , 2005 .

[19]  P. Albrecht,et al.  New Developments in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process: Part I. The Ploughing Process in Metal Cutting , 1960 .

[20]  H. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Influence of Flank Wear on the Stresses in a Cutting Tool , 1977 .

[21]  Jaroslav Mackerle,et al.  Finite-element analysis and simulation of machining: a bibliography (1976–1996) , 1999 .

[22]  E. G. Thomsen,et al.  The Role of Friction in Metal Cutting , 1960 .

[23]  Hideaki Kudo,et al.  Some new slip-line solutions for two-dimensional steady-state machining , 1965 .

[24]  Mjd Powell,et al.  A Fortran subroutine for solving systems of non-linear algebraic equations , 1968 .

[25]  P. Wright,et al.  Stress analysis in machining with the use of sapphire tools , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[26]  P. Dewhurst,et al.  A general matrix operator for linear boundary value problems in slip‐line field theory , 1985 .

[27]  G. Barrow,et al.  On the Stress Distribution Between the Chip and Tool During Metal Turning , 1989 .

[28]  W. Graham,et al.  Determination of rake face stress distribution in orthogonal machining , 1982 .

[29]  E. M. Trent,et al.  Metal cutting and the tribology of seizure: I seizure in metal cutting , 1988 .