Voluntary use of online lecture notes: correlates of note use and note use as an alternative to class attendance

Note taking and note reviewing are essential college student learning activities. A large number of carefully controlled studies have evaluated student effectiveness in implementing each of these skills and have found that both can be improved by providing instructor notes. While the Internet now offers a practical method for providing notes, some instructors are reluctant to offer notes because they fear that students will use these notes as an alternative to class attendance. This study used data collected by the server and questionnaires to describe voluntary use of online lecture notes, to search for correlates of individual patterns of note use, and to investigate student use of notes as an alternative to class attendance. Students primarily printed notes and used these notes during class presentations. There was some evidence that note users performed better on examinations than students who did not use notes. Some students did admit to using notes as an alternative to class attendance, but a comparison between the examination scores of those who admitted to this practice and those who claimed never to use notes for this purpose showed no significant differences in performance.

[1]  J. Hartley Notetaking Research: Resetting the Scoreboard , 1983 .

[2]  Stephen L. Benton,et al.  The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking , 1988 .

[3]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON STUDY SKILLS TRAINING IN A REALISTIC INSTRUCTIONAL ECONOMY , 1988 .

[4]  Nelson F. DuBois,et al.  Note-taking functions and techniques. , 1991 .

[5]  S. McKelvie,et al.  Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes. , 1986 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Kiewra A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond , 1989 .

[7]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[8]  Susan Ko,et al.  Teaching Online: A Practical Guide , 2000 .

[9]  Mary Dunn Siedow,et al.  An Investigation of the Effects of Note Taking on College Students' Recall of Signalled and Unsignalled Text. , 1985 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Kiewra Students' note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor's notes for review , 1985 .

[11]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning and study strategies : issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation , 1988 .

[12]  F. di Vesta,et al.  Listening and note taking. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[13]  James Hartley,et al.  On notes and note‐taking , 1974 .

[14]  Mark Grabe,et al.  Studying online: evaluation of an online study environment , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Kenneth A. Kiewra The process of review: A levels of processing approach , 1983 .

[16]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. , 2000 .

[17]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Predictors and Consequences of Achievement Goals in the College Classroom: Maintaining Interest and Making the Grade , 1997 .

[18]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  An Empirical Study of Lecture Note Taking among College Students , 1977 .

[19]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. , 1988 .

[20]  Annemarie Hauf,et al.  Computers in education , 1983 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Kiewra Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative , 1985 .

[22]  James I. Brown The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. , 1960 .

[23]  R. Lore,et al.  Note Taking and Note Review: Why Students Fail Questions Based on Lecture Material , 1980 .