Improving frequency and ROCOF accuracy during faults, for P class Phasor Measurement Units

Many aspects of Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) performance are tested using the existing (and evolving) IEEE C37.118 standard. However, at present the reaction of PMUs to power network faults is not assessed under C37.118. Nevertheless, the behaviour of PMUs under such conditions may be important when the entire closed loop of power system measurement, control and response is considered. This paper presents ways in which P class PMU algorithms may be augmented with software which reduces peak frequency excursions during unbalanced faults by factors of typically between 2.5 and 6 with no additional effect on response time, delay or latency. Peak ROCOF excursions are also reduced. In addition, extra filtering which still allows P class response requirements to be met can further reduce excursions, in particular ROCOF. Further improvement of triggering by using midpoint taps of the P class filter, and adaptive filtering, allows peak excursions to be reduced by total factors of between 8 and 40 (or up to 180 for ROCOF), compared to the C37.118 reference device. Steady-state frequency and ROCOF errors during sustained faults or unbalanced operation, particularly under unbalanced conditions, can be reduced by factors of hundreds or thousands compared to the C37.118 reference device.

[1]  Gareth A. Taylor,et al.  Novel application of detrended fluctuation analysis for state estimation using synchrophasor measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Gert Rietveld,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Fault Location on Mixed Line-Cable Transmission Corridors , 2013 .

[3]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Taylor–Kalman–Fourier Filters for Instantaneous Oscillating Phasor and Harmonic Estimates , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  James S. Thorp,et al.  IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems , 1998 .

[5]  Doaa Khalil Ibrahim,et al.  Fault location scheme for combined overhead line with underground power cable , 2006 .

[6]  Dario Petri,et al.  Effect of transient conditions on DFT-based synchrophasor estimator performance , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Workshop on Applied Measurements for Power Systems (AMPS) Proceedings.

[7]  M. Lixia,et al.  Adaptive Taylor-Fourier synchrophasor estimation for fast response to changing conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[8]  Geza Joos,et al.  Compliance Analysis of PMU Algorithms and Devices for Wide-Area Stabilizing Control of Large Power Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Junqi Liu,et al.  Adaptive load shedding based on combined frequency and voltage stability assessment using synchrophasor measurements , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Andrew J. Roscoe,et al.  Exploring the Relative Performance of Frequency-Tracking and Fixed-Filter Phasor Measurement Unit Algorithms Under C37.118 Test Procedures, the Effects of Interharmonics, and Initial Attempts at Merging P-Class Response With M-Class Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  José Antonio de la O. Serna,et al.  Synchrophasor Estimation Using Prony's Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  G. M. Burt,et al.  P and M Class Phasor Measurement Unit Algorithms Using Adaptive Cascaded Filters , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  Daniel Belega,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of the Multicycle Synchrophasor Estimator Provided by the Interpolated DFT Algorithm , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Paolo Castello,et al.  Impact of the Model on the Accuracy of Synchrophasor Measurement , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.