Under the Kitchen Surface: Domestic Products and Conflicting Constructions of Home

This paper examines how the product world around domestic cleanliness plays with the dual construction of the home as safe and dangerous. By participating in this construction, cleaning products engage with a salient concern in domestic life—how to achieve and maintain a safe domestic environment. We have investigated the discursive commentary on domestic cleanliness and safety in one domestic advice manual: Good Housekeeping magazine, over the period 1951–2001. This investigation has also provided insights into the discursive character of cleaning products. We have been interested in how product discourse moves the home discursively from exhibiting dangerous tendencies towards the attainment of safety through the utilization of products. However, reading product narratives over the late modern period makes it apparent that competition and the need for product innovation in an otherwise difficult market has created complexities that confront the domestic sphere with more dangers. We draw out the consequences of our findings and reflect on how this informs the assertion made by Ger and Yenicioglu (2004) about the connections between contemporary consumer culture, cleanliness and the domestic safe haven.

[1]  A. M. Snodgrass,et al.  Objects of desire , 1998, Nature.

[2]  M. Kaika Interrogating the geographies of the familiar: domesticating nature and constructing the autonomy of the modern home , 2004 .

[3]  From Rugs to Riches: Housework, Consumption and Modernity in Germany , 1999 .

[4]  Jacqueline Moore,et al.  Women's Magazines: THEIR INFLUENCE ON NUTRITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOOD HABITS , 1992 .

[5]  N. Clark,et al.  Lifebuoy Men, Lux Women: Commodification, Consumption, and Cleanliness in Modern Zimbabwe , 1996 .

[6]  Mark Harvey,et al.  BETWEEN DEMAND & CONSUMPTION: A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH , 2001 .

[7]  B. Berner The meaning of cleaning : The creation of harmony and hygiene in the home , 1998 .

[8]  F. Jameson,et al.  Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism , 1992 .

[9]  E. Goffman Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order , 1971 .

[10]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[11]  A. Warde,et al.  Consumption, Food and Taste: Culinary Antinomies and Commodity Culture , 1997 .

[12]  J. Winship,et al.  Inside Women's Magazines , 1987 .

[13]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[14]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[15]  Peggy J. Kreshel Stronger Than Dirt: A Cultural History of Advertising Personal Hygiene in America, 1875-1940 , 2002 .

[16]  S. Mallett Understanding Home: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2004 .

[17]  Suellen Hoy,et al.  Chasing Dirt: The American Pursuit of Cleanliness , 1996 .

[18]  D. Attar Wasting girls' time : the history and politics of home economics , 1990 .

[19]  R. Lacey Food Poisoning: The Rise Continues , 1993 .

[20]  Sue Scott,et al.  “The Unbearable Lightness of Cleaning”: Representations of Domestic Practice and Products in Good Housekeeping Magazine (UK): 1951–2001 , 2005 .

[21]  J. Baxter Relations with the public , 1976 .

[22]  M. Douglas,et al.  Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. , 1967 .

[23]  Marjo Kuronen The social organisation of motherhood: advice giving in maternity and child health care in Scotland and Finland , 1999 .

[24]  G. Ger,et al.  Clean and dirty: playing with boundaries of consumer’s safe havens , 2004 .

[25]  Jean-François Lyotard,et al.  The Postmodern Condition , 1979 .

[26]  Lise Saugeres Of tidy gardens and clean houses: housing officers as agents of social control , 2000 .

[27]  Sue Scott,et al.  Bringing Children (and Parents) into the Sociology of Consumption , 2004 .