Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI

The spatial resolution of three‐dimensional (3D) gradient‐echo T1‐weighted images, from 40 women with 25 malignant and 23 benign lesions, was purposely degraded to determine the role of spatial resolution in recording, analysis, and diagnosis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI. Images were recorded and analyzed at pixel resolution according to the 3TP method (Degani et al., Nat Med 1997;3:780–782). Reduction in spatial resolution degraded the appearance of foci with fast wash‐in and fast washout dynamics. This resulted in an increase in false‐negative diagnoses. The sensitivity for differentiating between malignant and benign lesions, using threshold criteria defined by the 3TP analysis, of 76% decreased to 60% and 24% for a 2‐ and 4‐fold reduction in spatial resolution, respectively, without affecting significantly the high specificity (96–100%). In order to minimize false‐negative diagnoses of contrast‐enhanced breast MRI and maintain high specificity, it is essential to record and analyze the dynamic behavior at high spatial resolution. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:862–867. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  L D Buadu,et al.  Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Scott Fields,et al.  Mapping pathophysiological features of breast tumors by MRI at high spatial resolution , 1997, Nature Medicine.

[3]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI of breast tumors , 2000, European Radiology.

[4]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. , 1995, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[6]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  G. Glover,et al.  Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[8]  G Brix,et al.  MR mammography with pharmacokinetic mapping for monitoring of breast cancer treatment during neoadjuvant therapy. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[9]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[11]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[13]  S. Edge,et al.  Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. , 1995, Radiology.

[14]  B. D. Klein,et al.  Dynamic MR mammography: A technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  M D Schnall,et al.  Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[17]  H. Degani,et al.  Response of MCF7 human breast cancer to tamoxifen: evaluation by the three-time-point, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging method. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[18]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  N M Hylton,et al.  Vascularity assessment of breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[20]  J. Allison,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  Frederick Kelcz,et al.  Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium‐enhanced MRI , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[24]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  G Brix,et al.  Multicompartment analysis of gadolinium chelate kinetics: Blood‐tissue exchange in mammary tumors as monitored by dynamic MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  A Horsman,et al.  Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  H. Degani,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging and analysis at high spatial resolution of MCF7 human breast tumors. , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[28]  P Aspelin,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of MR Mammography with Histopathological Correlation in 250 Breasts , 1996, Acta radiologica.

[29]  L D Buadu,et al.  Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. , 1996, Radiology.

[30]  C. Piccoli,et al.  Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity , 1997, European Radiology.

[31]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  Michael Brady,et al.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement , 1997, Medical Image Anal..