When an eco-feedback system joins the family

The dynamic, chaotic, intimate and social nature of family life presents many challenges when designing interactive systems in the household space. This paper presents findings from a whole-of-family approach to studying the use of an energy awareness and management system called “Ecosphere”. Using a novel methodology of inviting 12 families to create their own self-authored videos documenting their energy use, we report on the family dynamics and nuances of family life that shape and affect this use. Our findings suggest that the momentum of existing family dynamics in many cases obstructs behaviour change and renders some family members unaware of energy consumption despite the presence of an energy monitor display in the house. The implication for eco-feedback design is that it needs to recognise and respond to the kinds of family relations into which the system is embedded. In response, we suggest alternative ways of sharing energy-related information among families and incentivising engagement among teenagers.

[1]  James A. Landay,et al.  The design of eco-feedback technology , 2010, CHI.

[2]  Kathleen M. Galvin,et al.  Family Communication: Cohesion and Change , 1982 .

[3]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies , 2005, CHI.

[4]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[5]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Technology probes: experiences with home energy feedback , 2013 .

[6]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[7]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Motivating domestic energy conservation through comparative, community-based feedback in mobile and social media , 2011, C&T.

[8]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Cultivating energy literacy: results from a longitudinal living lab study of a home energy management system , 2013, CHI.

[9]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[10]  Judy Kay,et al.  Using an intergenerational communications system as a 'light-weight' technology probe , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[11]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[12]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Y. Strengers.  Beyond demand management: co-managing energy and water practices with Australian households , 2011 .

[14]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Located Accountabilities in Technology Production , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Curiosity to cupboard: self reported disengagement with energy use feedback over time , 2013, OZCHI.

[16]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Feedback on Household Electricity Consumption: Learning and Social Influence Processes , 2011 .

[17]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock , 2007, UbiComp.

[18]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  Yours, Mine and Ours? Sharing and Use of Technology in Domestic Environments , 2007, UbiComp.

[19]  Heather Chappells,et al.  Ordinary consumption and extraordinary relationships : utilities and their users , 2001 .

[20]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Connecting Families: The Impact of New Communication Technologies on Domestic Life , 2012 .

[21]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data , 2012, CHI.

[22]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Designing with Video: Focusing the user-centred design process , 2007 .

[23]  Milind R. Naphade,et al.  The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system , 2013, CHI.

[24]  Corinna Fischer.  Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? , 2008 .

[25]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Everyday activities and energy consumption: how families understand the relationship , 2013, CHI.

[26]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Users, Technologies and Expectations of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[27]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman , 2013, INTR.

[28]  Paul Johns,et al.  It's not easy being green: understanding home computer power management , 2009, CHI.

[29]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Video card game: an augmented environment for user centred design discussions , 2000, DARE '00.

[30]  Kori Inkpen Quinn,et al.  SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness , 2008, CSCW.

[31]  Nuno Jardim Nunes,et al.  Why don't families get along with eco-feedback technologies?: a longitudinal inquiry , 2013, CHItaly '13.