Spatial variation in particle number size distributions in a large metropolitan area

Air quality studies have indicated that particle number size distribution (NSD) is unevenly spread in urban air. To date, these studies have focussed on differences in concentration levels between sampling locations rather than differences in the underlying geometries of the distributions. As a result, the existing information on the spatial variation of the NSD in urban areas remains incomplete. To investigate this variation in a large metropolitan area in the southern hemisphere, NSD data collected at nine different locations during different campaigns of varying duration were compared using statistical methods. The spectra were analysed in terms of their modal structures (the graphical representation of the number size distribution function), cumulative distribution and number median diameter (NMD). The study found that with the exception of one site all distributions were bimodal or suggestive of bimodality. In general, peak concentrations were below 30 nm and NMDs below 50 nm, except at a site dominated by diesel trucks, where it shifted to around 50 and 60 nm respectively. Ultrafine particles (UFPs (<100 nm)) contributed to 82–90% of the particle number, nanoparticles (<50 nm) to around 60–70%, except at the diesel traffic site, where their contribution dropped to 50%. Statistical analyses found that the modal structures heterogeneously distributed throughout Brisbane whereas it was not always the case for the NMD. The discussion led to the following site classification: (1) urban sites dominated by petrol traffic, (2) urban sites affected by the proximity to the road and (3) an isolated site dominated by diesel traffic. Comparisons of weekday and weekend data indicated that, the distributions were not statistically different. The only exception occurred at one site, where there is a significant drop in the number of diesel buses on the weekend. The differences in sampling period between sites did not affect the results. The statistics instead suggested variations in traffic composition. However, the relative contribution of petrol vehicle emissions at each site could not be assessed due to the limited traffic information available.

[1]  Principal Investigator,et al.  DIESEL AEROSOL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY - CRC E-43 , 2002 .

[2]  R. Gehrig,et al.  Real-world emission factors of fine and ultrafine aerosol particles for different traffic situations in Switzerland. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  The modality of particle size distributions of environmental aerosols , 1999 .

[4]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Diesel Aerosol Sampling in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[5]  Pasi Aalto,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions , 2001 .

[6]  M. D. Maso,et al.  Modal characteristics of particulate matter in urban atmospheric aerosols , 2002 .

[7]  P. Paatero,et al.  Modal structure and spatial-temporal variations of urban and suburban aerosols in Helsinki-Finland , 2005 .

[8]  W. MacNee,et al.  Particulate air pollution and acute health effects , 1995, The Lancet.

[9]  Constantinos Sioutas,et al.  Quality control of semi-continuous mobility size-fractionated particle number concentration data , 2004 .

[10]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road , 2000 .

[11]  Jean Dickinson Gibbons,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1972, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[12]  Ernest Weingartner,et al.  A mobile pollutant measurement laboratory—measuring gas phase and aerosol ambient concentrations with high spatial and temporal resolution , 2002 .

[13]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Trends in size classified particle number concentration in subtropical Brisbane, Australia, based on a 5 year study , 2007 .

[14]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Differences in airborne particle and gaseous concentrations in urban air between weekdays and weekends , 2002 .

[15]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[16]  An experimental study of aerosol distribution over a Mediterranean urban area. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Victor M. Becerra,et al.  Combined bias and outlier identification in dynamic data reconciliation , 2002 .

[18]  H. Eichlseder,et al.  PM size distribution measurements in engine exhaust in context to road tunnel and ambient air measurements , 2003 .

[19]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .

[20]  J. Morin,et al.  On-road measurements of particle number concentrations and size distributions in urban and tunnel environments , 2004 .

[21]  D. Christiani,et al.  Effects of air pollutants on acute stroke mortality. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  Liisa Pirjola,et al.  Dispersion of particles and trace gases nearby a city highway: Mobile laboratory measurements in Finland , 2006 .

[23]  J. W. Fitzgerald,et al.  Aerosol size distributions and optical properties found in the marine boundary layer over the Atlantic Ocean , 1990 .

[24]  Kaarle Hämeri,et al.  Spatial variation of aerosol number concentration in Helsinki city , 1999 .

[25]  M. Lazaridis,et al.  Size distribution, composition and origin of the submicron aerosol in the marine boundary layer during the eastern Mediterranean “SUB-AERO” experiment , 2006 .

[26]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major Highway , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[27]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Effect of engine load on diesel soot particles. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Finn Palmgren,et al.  Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relationship to traffic , 2001 .

[29]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Comprehensive characterization of aerosols in a subtropical urban atmosphere : Particle size distribution and correlation with gaseous pollutants , 1998 .

[30]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1980 .

[31]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[32]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Sources and concentration of nanoparticles (<10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere , 2001 .

[33]  J. Seinfeld Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution , 1986 .

[34]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particles from Diesel Vehicle Emissions , 1998 .

[35]  P. Quinn,et al.  Aerosol physical properties and processes in the lower marine boundary layer: a comparison of shipboard sub-micron data from ACE-1 and ACE-2 , 2000 .

[36]  Ulrich Corsmeier,et al.  Vertical distribution of aerosol particles and NOx close to a motorway , 2005 .

[37]  Ruprecht Jaenicke,et al.  Chapter 1 Tropospheric Aerosols , 1993 .

[38]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  A STUDY OF THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PROFILE OF SUBMICROMETER PARTICLES IN RELATION TO A BUSY ROAD , 1999 .

[39]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Examination of the Size-Resolved and Transient Nature of Motor Vehicle Particle Emissions , 1999 .

[40]  E. R. Jayaratne,et al.  Spatial distribution of submicrometre particles and CO in an urban microscale environment , 2005 .

[41]  K. Willeke,et al.  Coincidence in time-of-flight aerosol spectrometers : phantom particle creation , 1991 .