Continuous soil maps - a fuzzy set approach to bridge the gap between aggregation levels of process and distribution models

Soil maps as multi-purpose models of spatial soil distribution have a much higher level of aggregation (map units) than the models of soil processes and land-use effects that need input from soil maps. This mismatch between aggregation levels is particularly detrimental in the context of precision agriculture. It is argued that, in order to bridge the gap, soil distribution modelling should be based on a new classification paradigm: that of fuzzy set theory. In geographic space, this enables representation of gradual as well as abrupt transitions, i.e., soil distribution models that can predict variables at pedon level. In a case study we used fuzzy k-means with extragrades to derive a continuous classification from data on thicknesses of 25 layers measured in 552 soil profiles. For interpolation of the class memberships we developed a new method, Compositional Kriging, which takes into account that the memberships have the structure of compositional data: they must be positive and add up to a constant (1) for each individual. These conditions were added to the regular Kriging equations. For cartographic representation of the continuous soil distribution models we developed a new technique, the Pixel Mixture technique, by which we generated a large number of small coloured pixels in each raster cell of the map. The colours of the pixels symbolize the classes, and the proportions of iso-coloured pixels in a cell symbolize the grades of the class memberships as predicted for that cell. The combination of continuous classification and Compositional Kriging convincingly bridged the gap between aggregation levels, and with the aid of the Pixel Mixture technique the resulting soil distribution model could also be visualized at the appropriate level of aggregation. The continuous soil map showed both the general landscape structure, as well as the varying degree of variability within the study area. Based on this multi-purpose continuous soil model, functional models of soil processes and land-use effects can be developed.

[1]  P. Burrough,et al.  FUZZY CLASSIFICATION METHODS FOR DETERMINING LAND SUITABILITY FROM SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATIONS AND TOPOGRAPHY , 1992 .

[2]  Sjoerd E. A. T. M. van der Zee,et al.  Simulation and areal interpolation of reactive solute transport , 1994 .

[3]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[4]  Abraham Kandel,et al.  Fuzzy techniques in pattern recognition , 1982 .

[5]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Design of optimal sample spacings for mapping soil using fuzzy-k-means and regionalized variable theory , 1990 .

[6]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Soil pattern recognition with fuzzy-c-means : application to classification and soil-landform interrelationships , 1992 .

[7]  Arnold K. Bregt,et al.  The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: a soil survey case study. , 1996 .

[8]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis , 1988 .

[9]  G. Delange,et al.  Geochemical characteristics as indicators of the provenance of madeira abyssal-plain turbidites - a statistical approach , 1988 .

[10]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[11]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error propagation in quantitative spatial modelling: Applications in geographical information systems , 1993 .

[12]  P. C. Robert,et al.  Continuous Models of Soil Variation for Continuous Soil Management , 1995 .

[13]  Enrique H. Ruspini,et al.  A New Approach to Clustering , 1969, Inf. Control..

[14]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[15]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Modelling production of field crops and its requirements , 1987 .

[16]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries , 1997 .

[17]  David A. Wismer,et al.  Introduction to nonlinear optimization : a problem solving approach , 1978 .

[18]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[19]  P. Lagacherie,et al.  Fuzzy k-means clustering of fields in an elementary catchment and extrapolation to a larger area , 1997 .

[20]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Application of fuzzy sets to climatic classification , 1985 .

[21]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Fuzzy‐c‐Means and Kriging for Mapping Soil as a Continuous System , 1992 .

[22]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  The application of fuzzy c-means cluster analysis and non-linear mapping to geochemical datasets: examples from Portugal , 1988 .

[23]  D. A. Davidson,et al.  A Land Evaluation Project in Greece Using GIS and Based on Boolean and Fuzzy Set Methodologies , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[25]  A. McBratney,et al.  A continuum approach to soil classification by modified fuzzy k‐means with extragrades , 1992 .

[26]  R. Barnes,et al.  Adding bounds to kriging , 1992 .

[27]  John C. Davis,et al.  Estimation of regionalized compositions: A comparison of three methods , 1995 .

[28]  Fangju Wang,et al.  Comparison of Boolean and Fuzzy Classification Methods in Land Suitability Analysis by Using Geographical Information Systems , 1992 .

[29]  S. Vriend,et al.  An application of lithogeochemistry to the evaluation of the Ni-sulphide ore potential of weathered serpentinites in the Fortaleza de Minas Greenstone Belt, Minas Gerais, Brazil , 1988 .

[30]  E. M. L. Beale,et al.  Mathematical programming in practice , 1968 .

[31]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Use of spatial prediction techniques and fuzzy classification for mapping soil pollutants , 1997 .

[32]  J. Bezdek Numerical taxonomy with fuzzy sets , 1974 .

[33]  L Chang,et al.  FUZZY REASONING A NEW QUANTITATIVE AID FOR LAND EVALUATION , 1987 .

[34]  I. Ohlsson Book reviewSite-specific management for agricultural systems: P.C. Robert, R.H. Rust and W.E. Larson (Editors). American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1995. ISBN 0-89118-127-X, Paperback, 993 pp., US$ 39 , 1996 .

[35]  John C. Davis,et al.  Volumetric calculations in an oil field: the basis method , 1993 .

[36]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Spacial prediction and mapping of continuous soil classes , 1992 .

[37]  J. Bouma,et al.  Simulation of moisture deficits and areal interpolation by universal cokriging , 1991 .

[38]  J. C. Dunn,et al.  A Fuzzy Relative of the ISODATA Process and Its Use in Detecting Compact Well-Separated Clusters , 1973 .

[39]  Sue J. Welham,et al.  Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual , 1994 .

[40]  J H Tang,et al.  TESTING OF FUZZY SET THEORY IN LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR RAINFED GRAIN MAIZE PRODUCTION , 1992 .