Investigating the Coping Mechanism Towards Technochanges: A Perspective of Social Network Theory

For the purpose of better understanding the sociopsychological factors involved in an individual's coping process towards technochanges, this study examines how the social capital derived from two types of social networks - supportive and informational - influences individual adaptation to the new ICT and its related performance. Based on the social network theory and the coping theory, we establish a research model that combines social network variables with psychometric ones. A total of 85 responses are analyzed to test the proposed model and its hypotheses using PLS and UCINET. The results show that the coping effort mechanism of individuals can be explained in terms of social networks. Specifically, supportive network position significantly predicts self-efficacy that explains emotion-focused coping mechanism, while informational network position significantly influences absorptive capacity that accounts for problem-focused coping mechanism. We conclude the paper by discussing theoretical and practical implications for the research findings in terms of social networks and technochanges.

[1]  H. Ibarra.  Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework , 1993 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[3]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[4]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Coping: pitfalls and promise. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[6]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[7]  D. Schunk.  Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning , 1990 .

[8]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[9]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[10]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Measuring occupational difficulty: A construct validation against training criteria. , 1987 .

[11]  Assessment of Computer Self-Efficacy: Instrument Development and Validation. , 1988 .

[12]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Implementing New Manufacturing Technology: The Related Effects of Technology Characteristics and User Learning Activities , 2002 .

[13]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[14]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[15]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[16]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Adjustment to Technological Change: From Mass To Computer-Automated Batch Production , 1988 .

[17]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[19]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  Ping Wang,et al.  Knowing why and how to innovate with packaged business software , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[23]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  TanriverdiHuseyin.  Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[25]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[27]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[28]  Wonseok Oh,et al.  Coauthorship Dynamics and Knowledge Capital: The Patterns of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration in Information Systems Research , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  F GallettaDennis,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups , 2003 .

[30]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Terri A. Scandura,et al.  An Investigation of Personal Learning in Mentoring Relationships: Content, Antecedents, and Consequences , 2002 .

[33]  S. Ashford,et al.  Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective , 1986 .

[34]  Sebastián Bruque Cámara,et al.  Individual Adaptation to IT-Induced Change: The Role of Social Networks , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Jerry Kanter.  Have we Forgotten the Fundamental it Enabler: Ease of Use , 2000, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[36]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[37]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[38]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[39]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[40]  E. Morrison,et al.  NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION , 2002 .

[41]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[42]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy , 2003 .

[43]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  There's No Place like Home? The Contributions of Work and Nonwork Creativity Support to Employees' Creative Performance , 2002 .

[44]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[46]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[47]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management , 1987 .