The functional half-life of an mRNA depends on the ribosome spacing in an early coding region.

Bacterial mRNAs are translated by closely spaced ribosomes and degraded from the 5'-end, with half-lives of around 2 min at 37 °C in most cases. Ribosome-free or "naked" mRNA is known to be readily degraded, but the initial event that inactivates the mRNA functionally has not been fully described. Here, we characterize a determinant of the functional stability of an mRNA, which is located in the early coding region. Using literature values for the mRNA half-lives of variant lacZ mRNAs in Escherichia coli, we modeled how the ribosome spacing is affected by the translation rate of the individual codons. When comparing the ribosome spacing at various segments of the mRNA to its functional half-life, we found a clear correlation between the functional mRNA half-life and the ribosome spacing in the mRNA region approximately between codon 20 and codon 45. From this finding, we predicted that inserts of slowly translated codons before codon 20 or after codon 45 should shorten or prolong, respectively, the functional mRNA half-life by altering the ribosome density in the important region. These predictions were tested on eight new lacZ variants, and their experimentally determined mRNA half-lives all supported the model. We thus suggest that translation-rate-mediated differences in the spacing between ribosomes in this early coding region is a parameter that determines the mRNAs functional half-life. We present a model that is in accordance with many earlier observations and that allows a prediction of the functional half-life of a given mRNA sequence.

[1]  L. Bossi,et al.  A small RNA downregulates LamB maltoporin in Salmonella , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[2]  D. Apirion Degradation of RNA in Escherichia coli. A hypothesis. , 1973, Molecular & general genetics : MGG.

[3]  M. Sørensen,et al.  Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli. The two glutamic acid codons GAA and GAG are translated with a threefold difference in rate. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  D. Court,et al.  In vivo recombineering of bacteriophage λ by PCR fragments and single-strand oligonucleotides , 2004 .

[5]  D. Apirion Degradation of RNA in Escherichia coli , 1973, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[6]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  Ribosome collisions and translation efficiency: optimization by codon usage and mRNA destabilization. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  J. Martinussen,et al.  Mechanism of post‐segregational killing by the hoklsok system of plasmid R1: sok antisense RNA regulates formation of a hok mRNA species correlated with killing of plasmid‐free cells , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[8]  J. Belasco,et al.  A 5'-terminal stem-loop structure can stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Genes & development.

[9]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Ribosome rescue: tmRNA tagging activity and capacity in Escherichia coli , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  M. Sørensen,et al.  Synthesis of proteins in Escherichia coli is limited by the concentration of free ribosomes. Expression from reporter genes does not always reflect functional mRNA levels. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Reinhard Wolf,et al.  Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2009 .

[12]  H. Čelešnik,et al.  Initiation of RNA decay in Escherichia coli by 5' pyrophosphate removal. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[13]  M. Jacquet,et al.  Initiation, elongation and inactivation of lac messenger RNA in Escherichia coli studied by measurement of its β-galactosidase synthesizing capacity in vivo☆ , 1971 .

[14]  D. Kennell,et al.  Evidence that the 5' end of lac mRNA starts to decay as soon as it is synthesized , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  G. Mackie Ribonuclease E is a 5′-end-dependent endonuclease , 1998, Nature.

[16]  A. Gultyaev,et al.  Programmed cell death by hok/sok of plasmid R1: processing at the hok mRNA 3'-end triggers structural rearrangements that allow translation and antisense RNA binding. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Court,et al.  Recombineering: a homologous recombination-based method of genetic engineering , 2009, Nature Protocols.

[18]  P. Valentin‐Hansen,et al.  Regulation of ompA mRNA stability: the role of a small regulatory RNA in growth phase‐dependent control , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  C. Petersen The functional stability of the lacZ transcript is sensitive towards sequence alterations immediately downstream of the ribosome binding site , 1987, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[20]  J. Friesen,et al.  Functional mRNA half lives in E. coli , 1978, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[21]  I. Lemm,et al.  Regulation of c-myc mRNA Decay by Translational Pausing in a Coding Region Instability Determinant , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[22]  Xuemei Chen,et al.  Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[23]  J. Belasco,et al.  Lost in translation: the influence of ribosomes on bacterial mRNA decay. , 2005, Genes & development.

[24]  Stanley N Cohen,et al.  Global analysis of Escherichia coli RNA degradosome function using DNA microarrays. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  G. Stormo,et al.  Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: sequences within the ribosome‐binding site , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  N. Costantino,et al.  Multicopy Plasmid Modification with Phage λ Red Recombineering , 2007 .

[27]  Marc Dreyfus,et al.  The Poly(A) Tail of mRNAs Bodyguard in Eukaryotes, Scavenger in Bacteria , 2002, Cell.

[28]  Sidney R. Kushner,et al.  mRNA Decay in Escherichia coli Comes of Age , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[29]  J. Belasco,et al.  Growth-rate dependent regulation of mRNA stability in Escherichia coli , 1984, Nature.

[30]  D. Turner,et al.  Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  H. Čelešnik,et al.  The bacterial enzyme RppH triggers messenger RNA degradation by 5′ pyrophosphate removal , 2008, Nature.

[32]  D. Steege Emerging features of mRNA decay in bacteria. , 2000, RNA.

[33]  E. Craig,et al.  Decay rates of different mRNA in E. coli and models of decay. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[34]  M. Dreyfus,et al.  Interdependence of translation, transcription and mRNA degradation in the lacZ gene. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  R. Sauer,et al.  Role of a Peptide Tagging System in Degradation of Proteins Synthesized from Damaged Messenger RNA , 1996, Science.

[36]  G. Storz,et al.  Modulating the outer membrane with small RNAs. , 2006, Genes & development.

[37]  C. Petersen Multiple determinants of functional mRNA stability: sequence alterations at either end of the lacZ gene affect the rate of mRNA inactivation , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  Marc Dreyfus,et al.  AU-Rich Sequences within 5′ Untranslated Leaders Enhance Translation and Stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.