Articulatory Strategies in Obstruent Production in Mandarin Esophageal Speech

Based on the comparison between 4 esophageal speakers and 4 normal laryngeal speakers, this study investigated the voice onset time (VOT) characteristics and the linguopalatal articulation in the production of Mandarin obstruent consonants. Results show that esophageal speakers distinguish unaspirated vs. aspirated plosives or affricates in a similar way as laryngeal speakers do. However, the aspirated plosives and affricates have a shorter VOT whereas the unaspirated plosives and affricates have a longer VOT in esophageal speech than in laryngeal speech. Interestingly, esophageal speech exhibits a significantly more extensive linguopalatal contact than normal speech does. Results suggest that articulatory strategies have been adjusted to facilitate the linguopalatal articulation as well as the sub-tosupra-laryngeal coordination by using a narrower air way in the production of esophageal speech.

[1]  S Motta,et al.  Aerodynamic findings in esophageal voice. , 2001, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[2]  M.L. Ng,et al.  Perceptions of Tonal Changes in Normal Laryngeal, Esophageal, and Artificial Laryngeal Male Cantonese Speakers , 1998, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[3]  M. Ng,et al.  Formant characteristics of vowels produced by Mandarin esophageal speakers. , 2009, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[4]  M. Wan,et al.  Effects of Place of Articulation and Aspiration on Voice Onset Time in Mandarin Esophageal Speech , 2007, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[5]  J Lerman,et al.  A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise. , 1983, Journal of communication disorders.

[6]  Mingxi Wan,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of Mandarin esophageal speech. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M. Ng,et al.  Fundamental Frequency, Intensity, and Vowel Duration Characteristics Related to Perception of Cantonese Alaryngeal Speech , 2000, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[8]  S Bennett,et al.  Acceptability ratings of normal, esophageal, and artificial larynx speech. , 1973, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  N. Isshiki,et al.  AIR VOLUME AND AIR FLOW RELATIONSHIPS OF SIX MALE ESOPHAGEAL SPEAKERS. , 1965, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[10]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.