Re-Evaluating Heritage Waste: Sustaining Material Values through Deconstruction and Reuse

ABSTRACT This article explores how heritage values can be productively sustained or transformed by processes of building deconstruction and materials reuse, which address the increasing magnitude of demolition waste, landfill and resource use in urban development. The article starts by examining literature in heritage studies, sustainable building, and discard studies, then presents two examples from Vancouver, a Canadian city under intense development pressure, to help frame questions from project and policy contexts. Building on these questions, it reviews the relationship between heritage values and waste, gaps in deconstruction and salvage policies, the classifications of materials in deconstruction and reuse, and possible expanded uses for heritage inventories. In the Anthropocene, merely conserving designated buildings, or salvaging character-defining elements associated with heritage values, is not only inadequate, it helps to define waste, or that which does not have value. An ethic of conservation is called for that makes place for deconstruction as an acceptable reuse strategy while addressing the fate of all existing buildings and materials.

[1]  Raffaello Cossu,et al.  Urban mining: Concepts, terminology, challenges. , 2015, Waste management.

[2]  A. Frangipane From spolia to recycling: the reuse of traditional construction materials in built heritage and its role in sustainability today: a review , 2015, Special Publications.

[3]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[4]  Rodney Harrison Forgetting to remember, remembering to forget: late modern heritage practices, sustainability and the ‘crisis’ of accumulation of the past , 2013 .

[5]  Giovanni Boccardi From Mitigation to Adaptation: A New Heritage Paradigm for the Anthropocene , 2015 .

[6]  Susan Ross,et al.  Heritage and waste: introduction , 2019 .

[7]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning , 2007 .

[8]  Gustavo F. Araoz Preserving heritage places under a new paradigm , 2011 .

[9]  Deniz Ergun,et al.  Inventorying Toronto's single detached housing stocks to examine the availability of clay brick for urban mining. , 2015, Waste management.

[10]  A. Roders,et al.  Wedding cultural heritage and sustainable development: three years after , 2014 .

[11]  Cornelius Holtorf,et al.  Averting loss aversion in cultural heritage , 2015 .

[12]  M. Crang,et al.  Following things of rubbish value: end-of-life ships, 'chock-chocky' furniture and the Bangladeshi middle class consumer , 2010 .

[13]  M. Hird Waste, Landfills, and an Environmental Ethic of Vulnerability , 2013 .