Stable and Intuitive Control of an Intelligent Assist Device

Safety and dependability are of the utmost importance for physical human-robot interaction due to the potential risks that a relatively powerful robot poses to human beings. From the control standpoint, it is possible to improve safety by guaranteeing that the robot will never exhibit any unstable behavior. However, stability is not the only concern in the design of a controller for such a robot. During human-robot interaction, the resulting cooperative motion should be truly intuitive and should not restrict in any way the human performance. For this purpose, we have designed a new variable admittance control law that guarantees the stability of the robot during constrained motion and also provides a very intuitive human interaction. The former characteristic is provided by the design of a stability observer while the latter is based on a variable admittance control scheme that uses the time derivative of the contact force to assess human intentions. The stability observer is based on a previously published stability investigation of cooperative motion which implies the knowledge of the interaction stiffness. A method to accurately estimate this stiffness online using the data coming from the encoder and from a multiaxis force sensor at the end effector is also provided. The stability and intuitivity of the control law are verified in a user study involving a cooperative drawing task with a 3 degree-of-freedom (dof) parallel robot as well as in experiments performed with a prototype of an industrial Intelligent Assist Device.

[1]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  An atlas of physical human-robot interaction , 2008 .

[2]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  General Model of Human-Robot Cooperation Using a Novel Velocity Based Variable Impedance Control , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[3]  J. Soechting,et al.  The mechanical behavior of the human forearm in response to transient perturbations , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[5]  Toru Tsumugiwa,et al.  Variable impedance control based on estimation of human arm stiffness for human-robot cooperative calligraphic task , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[6]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Human-inspired robot assistant for fast point-to-point movements , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Reiner Rugulies,et al.  Physical workload, ergonomic problems, and incidence of low back injury: a 7.5-year prospective study of San Francisco transit operators. , 2004, American journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Safety for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[9]  Ryojun Ikeura,et al.  Investigating the impedance characteristic of human arm for development of robots to co-operate with human operators , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Dragoljub Surdilovic,et al.  Contact stability issues in position based impedance control: theory and experiments , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Toru Tsumugiwa,et al.  Stability analysis for impedance control of robot for human-robot cooperative task system , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[13]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Stability guaranteed control: time domain passivity approach , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  I W Hunter,et al.  System identification of human joint dynamics. , 1990, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[15]  Ryojun Ikeura,et al.  Cooperative motion control of a robot and a human , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[16]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Investigation of human-robot interaction stability using Lyapunov theory , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Marilena Vendittelli,et al.  Physical Human-Robot Interaction in Anthropic Domains: Safety and Dependability , 2005 .

[18]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Stability guaranteed control: time domain passivity approach , 2004, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[19]  Hikaru Inooka,et al.  Variable impedance control of a robot for cooperation with a human , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safe Physical Human-Robot Interaction: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights , 2007, ISRR.

[21]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  How can human motion prediction increase transparency? , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  A fully decoupled 3-DOF translational parallel mechanism , 2004 .