Toward a “Smart” Nightstand Prototype: An Examination of Nightstand Table Contents and Preferences

Objective: Two studies were conducted to obtain an understanding of the types of items seniors keep in their nightstands and to understand how users feel about the possibility of “smart” furniture. Background: To enable aging in place and universal design, it is vital to understand the needs of a broad range of aging individuals, especially since there is little research on nightstand usage and design. Methods: Study 1 allowed for the development of a structured inventory of nightstand use today in assisted living and rehabilitation facilities. Study 1 led to Study 2, demonstrating the need to conceptualize new ideas for smart nightstands. Feedback was obtained from intergenerational participants who could discuss their needs and preferences for a smart nightstand. Results: In Study 1, more than 150 items were recorded and categorized into 25 different groups. The authors found that participants utilized the top portion of their nightstand as opposed to the lower sections; most items were found on top of the nightstand or in the top drawer. In Study 2, the authors found that the vast majority of participants are willing to consider the use of a smart nightstand. Participants discussed key functions and design preferences, which included carefully designed storage, the ability to move the nightstand up and down, contemporary design, and interaction through voice activation. Conclusion: Existing nightstands do not meet the needs of current users. This research provides greater understanding of the existing limitations associated with nightstands. Study 2 confirmed that user-centered design and the use of technology can be used to enhance daily living. Smart furniture may play a role in promoting the health and independence of diverse user groups.

[1]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies , 2000, CUU '00.

[2]  C. Brayne,et al.  Inability to get up after falling, subsequent time on floor, and summoning help: prospective cohort study in people over 90 , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Navigation for human-robot interaction tasks , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[4]  Ari Houser,et al.  PROFILES OF LONG-TERM CARE AND INDEPENDENT LIVING , 2006 .

[5]  K. Gibson,et al.  A Norovirus Outbreak at a Long-Term-Care Facility: The Role of Environmental Surface Contamination , 2005, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  M. Goodrich,et al.  Measuring the Intelligence of a Robot and its Interface , 2003 .

[7]  L. Rioux The well-being of aging people living in their own homes , 2005 .

[8]  James J. Callahan,et al.  Aging in Place , 2019 .

[9]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Adapting navigation strategies using motions patterns of people , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[10]  W. Mann,et al.  Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Digital aids for an aging society , 2005, CACM.

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on information systems for an aging society , 2006, TCHI.

[13]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[14]  Sara J. Czaja Technology and older adults:: designing for accessibility and usability , 2006, Assets '06.

[15]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Senior CHI: how can we make technology "elder-friendly?" , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[16]  Johan F M Molenbroek,et al.  Hand supports to assist toilet use among the elderly. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Common metrics for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[18]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  H. Bouma,et al.  GERONTECHNOLOGY: CREATING ENABLING ENVIRONMENTS FOR THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF AGING , 2000 .

[20]  William C. Mann,et al.  Consumer Feedback on Smart Home Applications , 2007 .

[21]  N. Chappell,et al.  Receptivity to new technology among older adults. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Toward Human-Aware Robot Task Planning , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: To Boldly Go Where No Human-Robot Team Has Gone Before.

[23]  S. A. R. Sharifah Norazizan,et al.  Ageing in place: Towards an ergonomically designed home environment for older Malaysians , 2005 .

[24]  V. Freedman,et al.  Incorporating Assistive Devices into Community-Based Long-Term Care , 2000, Journal of aging and health.

[25]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Developing technology to support the functional independence of older adults , 2001 .

[26]  S F Bloomfield,et al.  Spread and prevention of some common viral infections in community facilities and domestic homes , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[27]  K. Courtney,et al.  Obtrusiveness of information-based assistive technologies as perceived by older adults in residential care facilities: A secondary analysis , 2007, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[28]  Rafik A. Goubran,et al.  Integration of Smart Home Technologies in a Health Monitoring System for the Elderly , 2007, 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07).

[29]  Fermina Rojo Perez,et al.  Ageing in Place: Predictors of the Residential Satisfaction of Elderly , 2001 .

[30]  Ewa Nowak The role of anthropometry in design of work and life environments of the disabled population , 1996 .

[31]  John W. Kozey,et al.  Determination of the normal and maximum reach measures of adult wheelchair users , 2004 .

[32]  M. Skubic,et al.  Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[33]  L. Dutra,et al.  Human factors engineering approach to gerontechnology: development of an electronic medication compliance device. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[34]  Panu Harmo,et al.  Needs and solutions - home automation and service robots for the elderly and disabled , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[35]  Malcolm P Cutchin,et al.  The process of mediated aging-in-place: a theoretically and empirically based model. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[36]  Johnell O. Brooks,et al.  comforTABLE: A robotic environment for aging in place , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[37]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[38]  C. Gerba,et al.  Occurrence of bacteria and biochemical markers on public surfaces , 2005, International journal of environmental health research.

[39]  Natalie Rosel,et al.  Aging In Place: Knowing Where You Are , 2003, International journal of aging & human development.

[40]  Brian D. Carpenter,et al.  Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Martin Buss,et al.  Human-Robot Collaboration: a Survey , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.