The paddlefish rostrum functions as an electrosensory antenna in plankton feeding

A novel electrosensory function is presented for the large, plankton–feeding, freshwater paddlefish, Polyodon spathula, along with a hypothesis which accounts for the distinctive, elongated rostrum of this unusual fish. Behavioural experiments conducted in the ‘dark’ (under infrared illumination), to eliminate vision, show that paddlefish efficiently capture planktonic prey to distances up to 80–90 mm. They make feeding strikes at dipole electrodes in response to weak low–frequency electrical currents. Fish also avoid metal obstacles placed in the water, again in the dark. Electrophysiological experiments confirm that the Lorenzinian ampullae of paddlefish are sensitive to weak, low–frequency electrical signals, and demonstrate unequivocally that they respond to the very small electrical signals generated by their natural zooplankton prey (Daphnia sp.). We propose that the rostrum constitutes the biological equivalent of an electrical antenna, enabling the fish to accurately detect and capture its planktonic food in turbid river environments where vision is severely limited. The electrical sensitivity of paddlefish to metallic substrates may interfere with their migrations through locks and dams.

[1]  J. Yen,et al.  Outer Limits and Inner Structure: The 3-Dimensional Flow Field of Pleuromamma Xiphias (Calanoida: Metridinidae) , 1993 .

[2]  John D. Pettigrew,et al.  Electroreception and the Feeding Behaviour of Platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus: Monotremata: Mammalia) , 1995 .

[3]  H. F. Nachtrieb The primitive pores of Polyodon spathula (Walbaum) , 1910 .

[4]  Wayne A. Hubert,et al.  Habitat Use by Adult Paddlefish in the Upper Mississippi River , 1984 .

[5]  S. Gerking Chapter 6 – Particulate Feeding , 1994 .

[6]  J. Yen,et al.  Advertisement and concealment in the plankton: what makes a copepod hydrodynamically conspicuous? , 1996 .

[7]  David Bodznick,et al.  Segregation of electroreceptive and mechanoreceptive lateral line afferents in the hindbrain of chondrostean fishes , 1985, Brain Research.

[8]  R. W. Murray,et al.  The response of the ampullae of Lorenzini of elasmobranchs to electrical stimulation. , 1962, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  M. Boone,et al.  Field Studies , 1959, Nature.

[10]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  The electric sense of sharks and rays. , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  G. Langner,et al.  Electroreception and electrolocation in platypus , 1986, Nature.

[12]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Field and laboratory studies of the feeding behaviour of the piper Hyporhamphus ihi with reference to the role of the lateral line in feeding , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  K. Mann,et al.  Turbulence and the diffusive layers around small organisms , 1989 .

[14]  S. L. Sanderson Convergent and Alternative Designs for Vertebrate Suspension Feeding , 1993 .

[15]  G. D. Lange,et al.  Ampullary sense organs, peripheral, central and behavioral electroreception in chimeras (Hydrolagus, Holocephali, Chondrichthyes). , 1993, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[16]  R. Rosen,et al.  Feeding of Paddlefish, Polyodon spathula , 1981 .

[17]  John C. Montgomery Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray , 1984 .

[18]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Detection of Weak Electric Fields , 1988 .

[19]  D. B. S. H. Kistler The primitive pores of polyodon spathula , 1906 .

[20]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Simple Flow Tanks for Research and Teaching , 1978 .