论文信息 - Dispersal in Bank voles: benefits to emigrants or to residents?

Dispersal in Bank voles: benefits to emigrants or to residents?

The paper revises the recent hypotheses on the evolution of dispersal behaviour in voles, namely Emigrant Fitness Hypothesis (EFH) versus Resident Fitness Hypothesis (RFH), on the basis of 3-year study on dispersal of Bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780). The studied populations lived in three types of habitats: a small island, a rich alder forest (both optimal habitats) and small patches of woods (suboptimal habitat). The island population was treated as a control for dispersal occuring in two other populations.

J. Gliwicz

[1] J. Gliwicz. Individuals and populations of the bank vole in optimal, suboptimal and insular habitats , 1989 .

[2] J. Gliwicz. Seasonal Dispersal in Non-Cyclic Populations of Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis , 1988 .

[3] J. Gliwicz. The Role of Dispersal in Models of Small Rodent Population Dynamics , 1988 .

[4] A. Cockburn. Social Behaviour in Fluctuating Populations , 1987 .

[5] M. Gaines,et al. Dispersal in Small Mammals , 1980 .

[6] R. Tamarin. Dispersal, Population Regulation, and K-Selection in Field Mice , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[7] J. Gliwicz. Patterns of dispersal in non-cyclic populations of small rodents , 1992 .

[8] Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al. Animal dispersal : small mammals as a model , 1992 .

[9] J. Gliwicz. Habitat-Dependent Reproductive Success in Bank Voles , 1990 .

[10] R. Tamarin. Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles , 1990, Advances in Life Sciences.

[11] P. K. Anderson. Dispersal in rodents , 1989 .