Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Assessing Sustainable Development among Underprivileged Communities

One of the purposes of sustainable development assessment is to identify the most importance criteria and sub-criteria of sustainable development that have the most significant contribution to the local community. To date, few studies have inquired into qualitative methods to assess these criteria and sub-criteria. In response to this gap in the literature, we propose an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to prioritize thirteen sub-criteria of sustainable development among underprivileged community of Setiu Wetlands Terengganu. Consistency ratio and weighted geometric mean are the two important computation steps of the AHP prior to proposing global weights of sub-criteria. The computational results indicate that ‘Education’ is the most important sub-criteria with 15.4 % of global weight. At the other extreme ‘global economic partnership’ is the least important sub-criteria for this group of community. The outcome of the proposed method is a weight of sustainability for all sub-criteria which offers a guide to government in identifying the appropriate action for uplifting the community quality of life.

[1]  Murat Gunduz,et al.  Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[2]  Levent Yagmur,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis for localization equipment in a thermal power plant using the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) , 2016 .

[3]  Wafaa Saleh,et al.  Transportation sustainability index for Tabuk city in Saudi Arabia: an analytic hierarchy process , 2015 .

[4]  P. K. Joshi,et al.  Multi-criteria approach to geographically visualize the quality of life in India , 2016 .

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[6]  Abdulaziz Aldegheishem Evaluating the Urban Sustainable Development on the Basis of AHP: A Case Study for Riyadh City , 2014 .

[7]  Juliet Roper,et al.  Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: ‘We Have Arrived’ , 2014 .

[8]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[9]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[10]  M. T. Escobar,et al.  Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making , 2007 .

[11]  Mohd Ariffin Abu Hassan,et al.  Assessing environmental impacts of municipal solid waste of Johor by analytical hierarchy process , 2013 .

[12]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  H. S. Choi,et al.  Assessing the sustenance and evolution of social and cultural contexts within sustainable urban development, using as a case the MAC in South Korea , 2013 .

[14]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  H. Veisi,et al.  Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2016 .

[16]  Eduardo Rojí,et al.  Sustainability assessment methodology for industrial buildings: three case studies , 2016 .

[17]  Kamalakanta Muduli,et al.  Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach , 2015 .

[18]  S. Parkin,et al.  Sustainable development: understanding the concept and practical challenge , 2003 .

[19]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[20]  Muhammad Abdul Jalil,et al.  Sustainable Development in Malaysia: A Case Study on Household Waste Management , 2010 .