Observer study-based evaluation of a stochastic and physics-based method to generate oncological PET images
暂无分享,去创建一个
Abhinav K. Jha | Joyce Mhlanga | Ziping Liu | Richard Laforest | Barry A. Siegel | Tyler J. Fraum | Farrokh Dehdashti | Malak Itani | R. Laforest | B. Siegel | F. Dehdashti | M. Itani | T. Fraum | J. Mhlanga | Ziping Liu | Tyler J Fraum
[1] Fei Yang,et al. Quantitative radiomics: impact of stochastic effects on textural feature analysis implies the need for standards , 2015, Journal of medical imaging.
[2] Chi Wan Koo,et al. Evaluation of a projection-domain lung nodule insertion technique in thoracic computed tomography , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.
[3] Charles R. Giardina,et al. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..
[4] H. Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[5] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. A no-gold-standard technique for objective assessment of quantitative nuclear-medicine imaging methods , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.
[7] Valentino Bettinardi,et al. PET quantification: strategies for partial volume correction , 2014, Clinical and Translational Imaging.
[8] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. AI-based methods for nuclear-medicine imaging: Need for objective task-specific evaluation , 2020 .
[9] Paul Babyn,et al. Generative Adversarial Network in Medical Imaging: A Review , 2018, Medical Image Anal..
[10] Shuai Leng,et al. Validation of a Projection-domain Insertion of Liver Lesions into CT Images. , 2016, Academic radiology.
[11] C Lartizien,et al. GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.
[12] Jeffrey L. Gunter,et al. Medical Image Synthesis for Data Augmentation and Anonymization using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, SASHIMI@MICCAI.
[13] H H Barrett,et al. Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[14] Ehsan Samei,et al. Design and fabrication of heterogeneous lung nodule phantoms for assessing the accuracy and variability of measured texture radiomics features in CT , 2019, Journal of medical imaging.
[15] W. Segars,et al. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. , 2010, Medical physics.
[16] Matthew A Kupinski,et al. Objective assessment of image quality VI: imaging in radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[17] H C Gifford. Efficient visual-search model observers for PET. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.
[18] A. Laine,et al. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET. , 2014, Medical physics.
[19] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. An estimation-based segmentation method to delineate tumors in PET images. , 2020 .
[20] Eric Clarkson,et al. Experimental determination of object statistics from noisy images. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[21] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Impact of partial-volume correction in oncological PET studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[22] Paul Kinahan,et al. Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges. , 2010, Imaging in medicine.
[23] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Tumor Volume and Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Impact of Dual–Time Point and Segmentation Methods , 2017, Clinical nuclear medicine.
[24] Kyle J Myers,et al. Physiological random processes in precision cancer therapy , 2018, PloS one.
[25] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. Practical no-gold-standard evaluation framework for quantitative imaging methods: application to lesion segmentation in positron emission tomography , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.
[26] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Accuracy and Precision of Partial-Volume Correction in Oncological PET/CT Studies , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[27] Ulas Bagci,et al. A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.
[28] Federico Turkheimer,et al. Importance of Quantification for the Analysis of PET Data in Oncology: Review of Current Methods and Trends for the Future , 2012, Molecular Imaging and Biology.
[29] Hyunsuk Shim,et al. Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response. , 2011, Seminars in oncology.
[30] Abhinav K. Jha,et al. A no-gold-standard technique for objective evaluation of quantitative nuclear-medicine imaging methods in the presence of correlated noise , 2020 .
[31] Melanie Grunwald,et al. Foundations Of Image Science , 2016 .
[32] Vicky Goh,et al. Challenges and Promises of PET Radiomics , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.