Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups

This study examined how the performance of diverse teams is affected by member openness to experience and the extent to which team reward structure emphasizes intragroup differences. Fifty-eight heterogeneous four-person teams engaged in an interactive task. Teams in which reward structure converged with diversity (i.e., “faultline” teams) performed more poorly than teams in which reward structure cut across differences between group members or pointed to a “superordinate identity.” High openness to experience positively influenced teams in which differences were salient (i.e., faultline and “cross-categorized” teams) but not teams with a superordinate identity. This effect was mediated by information elaboration.

[1]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2001 .

[2]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[3]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[4]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[5]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. , 2004 .

[6]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  Realizing the Diversity Dividend: Exploring the Subtle Interplay between Identity, Ideology, and Reality , 2003 .

[7]  W. Haythorn,et al.  The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[8]  W DreudeC.K.,et al.  Interacting dimensions of diversity: Cross-categorization and the functioning of diverse work groups , 2007 .

[9]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[10]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Revised NEO personality inventory , 1995 .

[11]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[12]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[13]  P. McLeod,et al.  Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior On a Group Task , 1991 .

[14]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance , 2003 .

[16]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[18]  Peter A. Ammermann,et al.  The “Threat Hypothesis,” Personality, and Attitudes toward Diversity , 2003 .

[19]  Ken A. Smith,et al.  Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams , 1999 .

[20]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Understanding Why Team Members Won’t Share , 2000 .

[21]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[22]  John C. Turner,et al.  Rediscovering the Social Group , 1987 .

[23]  B. Mullen,et al.  The effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis , 1998 .

[24]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Susan L. Kichuk,et al.  The big five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams , 1997 .

[26]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[27]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Cooperation, competition and team performance: Toward a contingency approach , 2002 .

[28]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[29]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[31]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[32]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Dealing with Scarce Resources , 1998 .

[33]  M. Sherif.  Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup Conflict , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  J. Hull,et al.  Moderator Variables in Personality Research: The Problem of Controlling for Plausible Alternatives , 1992 .

[35]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[36]  D. Hambrick,et al.  FACTIONAL GROUPS: A NEW VANTAGE ON DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES, CONFLICT, AND DISINTEGRATION IN WORK TEAMS , 2005 .

[37]  Henry Moon.  ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY : DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS , 2004 .

[38]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[40]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  M. Platow,et al.  Unity Through Diversity: Value-in-Diversity Beliefs, Work Group Diversity, and Group Identification , 2007 .

[42]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[43]  N. Akrami,et al.  The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach , 2003 .

[44]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[46]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[47]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[48]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes , 2001 .

[49]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. , 1995 .

[51]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[52]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[53]  M. Hogg,et al.  Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction , 2000 .

[54]  R. Peterson,et al.  7. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups , 2001 .

[55]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Trait configurations in self-managed teams: a conceptual examination of the use of seeding for maximizing and minimizing trait variance in teams. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  R. McCrae.  Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. , 1987 .

[59]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[60]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Effects of Perceived Skill Dissimilarity and Task Interdependence on Helping in Work Teams , 2005 .

[61]  Francis J. Flynn.  Having an open mind: the impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model , 2000 .

[64]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[65]  R. Piedmont,et al.  The Revised NEO Personality Inventory , 1998 .

[66]  Norman Miller,et al.  Cross‐cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias , 1993 .

[67]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[68]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[69]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Collective and individual improvement activities: the role of reward systems , 2002 .

[70]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[71]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Managing diversity: The role of social identities. , 1995 .

[72]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .