Prognostic Value of the Pace of Tumor Progression as Assessed by Serial 18F-FDG PET/CT Scan and Liquid Biopsy in Refractory Colorectal Cancer: The CORIOLAN Trial

Simple Summary Management of chemorefractory colorectal cancer patient is challenging, and reliable tools which can predict individual patient prognosis and help the decision making are needed. In this study, we hypothesized that the natural pace of cancer growth and progression, as assessed by early changes of a number of imaging and circulating biomarkers which are surrogates of tumor burden (i.e., metabolically active tumor volume, carcinoembryonic antigen, circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA), could predict patient prognosis. By prospectively recruiting 47 eligible patients who had measurements of these biomarkers taken two weeks apart in the absence of any active anti-cancer treatment, we failed to demonstrate our hypothesis. On the other hand, we found that baseline assessment of the same biomarkers was associated with survival outcomes. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and translate them into applications for clinical practice. Abstract Introduction: Decision making in refractory colorectal cancer (rCRC) is challenging, with limited data available to predict patient outcome. We conducted a study to assess the pace of cancer progression as a potential prognostic and decision tool. Methods: CORIOLAN was a prospective, single-center, single-arm trial recruiting refractory CRC patients with an ECOG performance status of ≤1 and an estimated life expectancy of ≥12 weeks. 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 2 weeks with no cancer treatment given between these timepoints. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between pace of cancer progression as defined by changes of the whole-body metabolically active tumor volume (WB-MATV) and overall survival (OS). Exploratory objectives included evaluation of the prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Results: 47 eligible patients who had received a median number of 5 (range 2–8) prior treatments were enrolled. At the time of analysis, 45 deaths had occurred, with 26% of patients dying within 12 weeks. The median OS was 6.3 months (range 0.4–14.3). The median relative delta between WB-MATV at baseline and 2 weeks was +21%. Changes of WB-MATV, however, failed to predict OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.3, p = 0.383). Similarly, no association was observed between changes of any of the circulating biomarkers investigated and prognosis. By contrast, high WB-MATV (4.2 versus 9.4 months; HR 3.1, p = 0.003), high CEA (4.4 versus 7.0 months; HR 1.9, p = 0.053), high cfDNA (4.7 versus 7.0 months; HR 2.2, p = 0.015) and high CTC count (3.3 versus 7.5 months; HR 6.5, p < 0.001) at baseline were associated with worse OS. Conclusions: In this study, approximately 1 out of 4 refractory CRC patients who were judged to have a life expectancy >12 weeks actually died within 12 weeks. Baseline assessment of WB-MATV, cfDNA, CTCs and CEA, but not early change evaluation of the same, may help to refine patient prognostication and guide management decisions.

[1]  K. Spindler,et al.  Total circulating cell-free DNA as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer before first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  P. Flamen,et al.  Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT–Based Metabolically Active Tumor Volume and Circulating Cell-Free DNA Significantly Improves Outcome Prediction in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  P. Flamen,et al.  Validation of Metabolically Active Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis as 18F-FDG PET/CT–derived Prognostic Biomarkers in Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J. Hay,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib and TAS‐102 in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States , 2018, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[5]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[6]  Daniel J Sargent,et al.  Clinical Calculator for Early Mortality in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Analysis of Patients From 28 Clinical Trials in the Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive Database. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Beretta,et al.  Estimating 12-week death probability in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: the Colon Life nomogram , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  G. Fontanini,et al.  FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  Turgay Ayer,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Regorafenib for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  Marc Peeters,et al.  Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  D. Sargent,et al.  Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[14]  M. Piccart,et al.  Serial FDG-PET/CT for early outcome prediction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  Michael Morse,et al.  Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  D. Sargent,et al.  Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Clinical determinants of survival in patients with 5-fluorouracil-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a multivariate analysis of 3825 patients. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.