A review of reference models for assessing inelastic seismic torsional effects in buildings

Abstract This paper reviews the various forms of reference model adopted for studies that evaluate inelastic seismic torsional effects and assess their implications for building design. Both qualitative and quantitative comparisons are presented. The importance of selecting an appropriate reference model is in accordance with the above aims is emphasised. It is found that variations in the reference models adopted in analyses of inelastic seismic torsional effects may lead to significant differences in the results obtained and, hence, to the conclusions drawn from such studies. It is demonstrated that accidental torsional effects, as incorporated in code design provisions, result in significant changes to the distribution of element strengths and the inelastic response behaviour of symmetric and generalised torsionally balanced reference models. Such changes should be considered when employing such models to evaluate the ineslatic response of torsionally unbalanced building systems.

[1]  Avigdor Rutenberg,et al.  Seismic code provisions for asymmetric structures: a re-evaluation , 1987 .

[2]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of one‐storey, asymmetric‐plan systems: Effects of system parameters and yielding , 1991 .

[3]  A. G. Brady,et al.  A STUDY ON THE DURATION OF STRONG EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1975 .

[4]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions I: Ductility demand , 1992 .

[5]  A. M. Chandler,et al.  Evaluation of factors influencing the inelastic seismic performance of torsionally asymmetric buildings , 1991 .

[6]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Additional seismic inelastic deformation caused by structural asymmetry , 1990 .

[7]  Avigdor Rutenberg,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of code designed single storey asymmetric structures , 1992 .

[8]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  An Evaluation of Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra , 1981 .

[9]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Lateral strength distribution specification to limit additional inelastic deformation of torsionally unbalanced structures , 1992 .

[10]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Strength eccentricity concept for inelastic analysis of asymmetrical structures , 1989 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of one-storey, asymmetric-plan systems : effects of stiffness and strength distribution , 1990 .

[12]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Effect of Peak Ground a/v Ratio on Structural Damage , 1988 .

[13]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of Torsional Provisions in Seismic Codes , 1991 .

[14]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Design of torsionally unbalanced structural systems based on code provisions II: Strength distribution , 1992 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  EFFECTS OF PLAN ASYMMETRY IN INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF ONE-STORY SYSTEMS , 1991 .

[16]  W. K. Tso,et al.  STATIC ECCENTRICITY CONCEPT FOR TORSIONAL MOMENT ESTIMATIONS , 1990 .