Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index

Walkability indices can guide planning and policy for more sustainable and liveble cities. Land-use mix is an important component of walkability that can be measured in a number of ways. Many land-use mix measures require fine-scaled land-use data that are not always available, especially when analyzing walkability across larger geographic extents. This study investigated the feasibility of calculating a national walkability index in Australia, using metropolitan Melbourne as a case study. The study focused on the dual challenges of selecting an appropriate measure of land-use mix and identifying an appropriate land-use data source. We calculated an entropy land-use mix measure with three different Australian land-use datasets. Our comparison of the resulting land-use mix measures highlighted the differences in the land-use datasets and led to our conclusion that none of the three land-use datasets was appropriate for use in a national land-use mix measure. Therefore, we also developed two new exploratory “intensity” measures of land use — daily living and local living — that were able to be calculated nationally with readily available data. Modelled associations with transport walking and comparisons with the entropy land-use mix measures indicate that these new measures were appropriate for assessing national land use in a national walkability index.

[1]  Paula Hooper,et al.  Evaluating the Implementation and Active Living Impacts of a State Government Planning Policy Designed to Create Walkable Neighborhoods in Perth, Western Australia , 2014, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[2]  J. Sallis,et al.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. , 2009, Health & place.

[5]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity: Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[6]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN adult study , 2014, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[7]  Nectarios Rose,et al.  An objective index of walkability for research and planning in the Sydney Metropolitan Region of New South Wales, Australia: an ecological study , 2013, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[8]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Reconnecting urban planning with health: a protocol for the development and validation of national liveability indicators associated with noncommunicable disease risk behaviours and health outcomes. , 2014, Public health research & practice.

[9]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Effect of Scale on the Links between Walking and Urban Design , 2011 .

[10]  Paul Mitchell Hess,et al.  Measuring Land Use Patterns for Transportation Research , 2001 .

[11]  R. Daniels,et al.  Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply , 2013 .

[12]  Kevin Manaugh,et al.  What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix , 2013 .

[13]  K. Clifton,et al.  Operationalizing Land Use Diversity at Varying Geographic Scales and Its Connection to Mode Choice , 2014 .

[14]  J. Sallis,et al.  Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease , 2012, Circulation.

[15]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[16]  Fiona Bull,et al.  The impact of neighborhood walkability on walking: does it differ across adult life stage and does neighborhood buffer size matter? , 2014, Health & place.

[17]  M. Duncan,et al.  Relationships of Land Use Mix with Walking for Transport: Do Land Uses and Geographical Scale Matter? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[18]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  The 3Ds + R: Quantifying Land Use and Urban Form Correlates of Walking , 2006 .

[19]  F. Bull,et al.  How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study , 2011, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[20]  Ikuho Yamada,et al.  Mixed Land Use and Obesity: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Land Use Measures and Geographic Scales , 2012, The Professional geographer : the journal of the Association of American Geographers.

[21]  Anthony Albanese,et al.  Our cities, our future - a national urban policy for a productive, sustainable and liveable future , 2011 .

[22]  Yan Song,et al.  Comparing measures of urban land use mix , 2013, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[23]  Louis A. Merlin Measuring Community Completeness: Jobs—Housing Balance, Accessibility, and Convenient Local Access to Nonwork Destinations , 2014 .

[24]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Developing a research and practice tool to measure walkability: a demonstration project. , 2014, Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals.

[25]  A. Bauman,et al.  Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[26]  J. Sallis,et al.  The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.