A bridge too far: examining the impact of facilitators on information transfer in global virtual project networks

As the architecture, engineering and construction industry globalizes and the use of virtual environments to connect this workforce becomes more common, it becomes increasingly important to understand how to best support efficient systems of information transfer in technologically mediated workspaces. Previous research has demonstrated that global project networks face technological challenges that can interfere with collaboration, and it has been argued that facilitators are an effective means to help networks overcome these challenges. We conducted a study to determine how facilitators impact the transfer of information through a global project network in a modally robust virtual workspace by examining the centrality of facilitators and actors from different knowledge domains. We used task conflict duration as an outcome variable in comparing the performance of two facilitated and two non-facilitated networks of student teams engaged in complex design and planning projects. Our findings indicate that wh...

[1]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams , 1999, ECSCW.

[2]  Shobha Ramalingam,et al.  Enabling conditions for the emergence and effective performance of technical and cultural boundary spanners in global virtual teams , 2011 .

[3]  N. Biggart,et al.  Economic Worlds of Work: Uniting Economic Sociology with the Sociology of work , 2005 .

[4]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[5]  Alexandria Rushley,et al.  Do you know what I know , 2009 .

[6]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[7]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Virtual Teams: Guide to Successful Implementation , 2002 .

[8]  Denise Silver,et al.  Joint Application Development , 1995 .

[9]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Construction Crises as Periods of Social Adjustment , 1997 .

[10]  D. Tjosvold.  Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality. , 1997 .

[11]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[12]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[13]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[14]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Meeting facilitation: process versus content interventions , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  The facilitators perspective on meetings and implications for group support systems design , 1999, DATB.

[17]  Souren Paul,et al.  Cultural Diversity, Conflict and Team Facilitation in Global Virtual Teams - a research model , 2004, AMCIS.

[18]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[19]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[20]  L P Sullivan,et al.  QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT , 1996 .

[21]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups , 2002 .

[23]  Stephen C. Hayne,et al.  Distributed facilitation: a concept whose time has come? , 1992, CSCW '92.

[24]  Linda A. Macaulay.  Seven-Layer Model of the Role of the Facilitator in Requirements Engineering , 1999, Requirements Engineering.

[25]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Group Facilitation and Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[26]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Emergence and Role of Cultural Boundary Spanners in Global Engineering Project Networks , 2010 .

[27]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[28]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Factors impacting usage patterns of collaborative tools designed to support global virtual design project networks , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[29]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Accuracy decomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. , 1998 .

[30]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  TASK VERSUS RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT: A META-ANALYSIS. , 2002 .

[31]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Social Network Model of Construction , 2008 .

[32]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Do You Know What I Know? A Shared Understandings Perspective on Text-Based Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Peter Wittenburg,et al.  ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research , 2006, LREC.

[37]  Irving M. Lane,et al.  A note on the role of laboratory methodologies in applied behavioural research: Don't throw out the baby with the bath water , 1988 .

[38]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..