Noise underlies switching behavior of the bacterial flagellum.

We report the switching behavior of the full bacterial flagellum system that includes the filament and the motor in wild-type Escherichia coli cells. In sorting the motor behavior by the clockwise bias, we find that the distributions of the clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) intervals are either exponential or nonexponential with long tails. At low bias, CW intervals are exponentially distributed and CCW intervals exhibit long tails. At intermediate CW bias (0.5) both CW and CCW intervals are mainly exponentially distributed. A simple model suggests that these two distinct switching behaviors are governed by the presence of signaling noise within the chemotaxis network. Low noise yields exponentially distributed intervals, whereas large noise yields nonexponential behavior with long tails. These drastically different motor statistics may play a role in optimizing bacterial behavior for a wide range of environmental conditions.

[1]  Robert Zwanzig,et al.  Rate processes with dynamical disorder , 1990 .

[2]  Robert Zwanzig,et al.  Dynamical disorder: Passage through a fluctuating bottleneck , 1992 .

[3]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  How white noise generates power-law switching in bacterial flagellar motors. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[4]  M. Welch,et al.  Effects of phosphorylation, Mg2+, and conformation of the chemotaxis protein CheY on its binding to the flagellar switch protein FliM. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[5]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  J. Adler.  Chemotaxis in Bacteria , 1966, Science.

[7]  R. Macnab,et al.  Distinct regions of bacterial flagellar switch protein FliM interact with FliG, FliN and CheY. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Adler,et al.  Chemotaxis: Old and New , 1988 .

[9]  D. Gillespie.  The mathematics of Brownian motion and Johnson noise , 1996 .

[10]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Hidden stochastic nature of a single bacterial motor. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[11]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[12]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  D. Brown,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analyzed by three-dimensional tracking. , 1974, Antibiotics and chemotherapy.

[14]  S. Lowen.  The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[15]  M Welch,et al.  Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Stock,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis and the molecular logic of intracellular signal transduction networks. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[17]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  Conformational Spread as a Mechanism for Cooperativity in the Bacterial Flagellar Switch , 2010, Science.

[19]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  The switching dynamics of the bacterial flagellar motor , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[20]  J. Vilar,et al.  From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium , 2004, Nature.

[21]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria , 2010, Nature.