The role of impressions on users’ tactile interaction with product materials: An analysis of associative concept networks

Abstract Depth impressions are an inner associative layer of humans’ expressed impressions. To analyze tactile interaction, it is essential to examine what users feel and imagine and how they create depth impressions by touching and looking at different product materials. On the basis of tactile interactions, this study aims to capture and analyze users’ depth impressions of materials. This research also proposes an ‘impressionably’ new tactile material for design from the viewpoint of depth impressions. To capture depth impressions, we investigated users’ tactile interactions in an experiment. The experiment used samples of six common natural and artificial materials, along with the proposed new micro-print-based material. A concept network-based method was employed in two stages to analyze the experimentally obtained verbalized protocols and to identify any depth impressions. This method allowed us to capture and analyze the depth impressions behind the surface impressions. This research found that the feel of materials’ tactile naturalness and users’ habituation to the tested samples are related to their depth impressions and the complexity of their concept networks. The depth impressions and concept network of the proposed micro-print material are distinct and beyond those for existing natural or artificial materials. These findings will provide the basis for employing new analysis tools and facilitate the development of impressionably better tactile materials for design.

[1]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  Looking hot or feeling hot: What determines the product experience of warmth? , 2010 .

[2]  T. Taura,et al.  Heart of Impressions , 2009 .

[3]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[4]  Yukari Nagai,et al.  A Method to Generate and Evaluate a Creative Design Idea by Focusing on Associative Process , 2009 .

[5]  K. Krippendorff The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation For Design , 2005 .

[6]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[7]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[8]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes , 2009 .

[10]  大富 浩一 Design of Worth for Consumer Product Development( What is "What's the Design"?) , 2009 .

[11]  T. Taura,et al.  A concept network method based on analysis of impressions formation Color schemes of uniforms from impressions of seasons , 2009 .

[12]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society , 2011 .

[13]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers , 2007 .

[14]  I. E. H. van Kesteren Product designers’ information needs in materials selection , 2008 .

[15]  D. Valentin,et al.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[16]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[17]  Michael Jünger,et al.  Graph Drawing Software , 2003, Graph Drawing Software.

[18]  Hideyoshi Yanagisawa,et al.  Development of Interactive Industrial Design Support System Considering Customer's Evaluation , 2004 .

[19]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[20]  Terri Gullickson The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. , 1995 .

[21]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design , 2002 .

[22]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[23]  K. Hilton RELIABILITY OF EMOTIONAL RESPONSES TO MATERIAL TEXTURES , 2008 .

[24]  Elvin Karana,et al.  A tool for meaning driven materials selection , 2010 .

[25]  Brian Henson,et al.  Materials’ tactile testing and characterisation for consumer products’ affective packaging design , 2009 .

[26]  T. V. Rompay,et al.  Product expression : Bridging the gap between the symbolic and the concrete , 2008 .

[27]  Georgi V. Georgiev,et al.  METHOD OF DESIGN THROUGH STRUCTURING OF MEANINGS , 2008 .