A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities

This study uses the method of citation context analysis to compare differences in citation contexts, including cited concepts and citation functions, between natural sciences (NS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), based on articles citing Little Science, Big Science (LSBS) published between 1963 and 2010. The findings indicate that NS and SSH researchers frequently cite LSBS as a source that is related to a specific topic and as evidence to support a claim. No significant differences were identified in the distribution of cited concepts included in LSBS, but significant differences were observed in the reasons for citing LSBS between NS and SSH citing articles. However, reverse trends were observed in the percentage of some cited concepts and citation functions between NS and SSH, which implies that subtle differences in citation behavior exist between NS and SSH researchers. In addition, each concept category has a different half-life. Concepts related to characteristics of big science and scientific collaboration have the longest half-lives.

[1]  H. D. White.  Citation Analysis and Discourse Analysis Revisited. , 2004 .

[2]  R. E. Burton,et al.  The “half‐life” of some scientific and technical literatures , 1960 .

[3]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[4]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Fifty years of invasion ecology – the legacy of Charles Elton , 2008 .

[5]  W. Shadish,et al.  Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals , 1995 .

[6]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities: Research Articles , 2006 .

[7]  Susan E. Cozzens.  Split Citation Identity: A Case Study from Economics , 1982, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  G. Gilbert.  Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[9]  L. Hargens.  Using the Literature: Reference networks, reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[10]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Little Book, Big Book , 2003, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Susan Bonzi,et al.  Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others , 1991, Scientometrics.

[13]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields , 1983, Scientometrics.

[14]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson (1991)? A citation context study , 2010 .

[15]  C. O. Frost.  The Use of Citations in Literary Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions , 1979, The Library Quarterly.

[16]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[17]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Manuel Núñez-Nickel,et al.  The multilayered nature of reference selection , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  How influential is Brooks’ Law? A longitudinal citation context analysis of Frederick Brooks’ The Mythical Man-Month , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  Ben-Ami Lipetz,et al.  Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators , 1965 .

[21]  Nigel Harwood.  An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines , 2009 .

[22]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Kuhn's structure of scientific revolutions in the psychological journal literature, 1969-1983: a Descriptive study , 1988 .

[23]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[24]  Marc H. Anderson.  How Can We Know What We Think Until We See What We Said?: A Citation and Citation Context Analysis of Karl Weick’s The Social Psychology of Organizing , 2006 .

[25]  S. Cozzens.  Comparing the Sciences: Citation Context Analysis of Papers from Neuropharmacology and the Sociology of Science , 1985 .

[26]  Mengxiong Liu,et al.  Progress in Documentation the Complexities of citation Practice: a Review of citation studies , 1993, J. Documentation.

[27]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[28]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics , 1989, Scientometrics.

[29]  I. Spiegel-Rosing.  Science Studies: Bibliometric and Content Analysis , 1977 .

[30]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  CITATION MEASURES OF THE INFLUENCE OF ROBERT K. MERTON , 1980 .

[32]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.