Tracking analysis for general linearly coupled dynamical systems

Tracking analysis problem is studied for general linearly coupled dynamical systems in this paper. One challenging and essential question for this issue is that: At least how many nodes should be informed about the objective tracking signal? This paper is devoted to answer this question. Two dynamical network models are considered. The first one, each individual has its own dynamics and simultaneously influenced by its neighbors’ information. The dynamics of itself could be stable, periodic, semi-periodic, and chaotic. The second one, each individual update its state just according to the error states different from its communicated neighbors. The main contribution of this paper is that the minimum number of controllers is designed to force the state of each agent to the desired objective by fully utilizing the structure of the network. The convergence rate can also be estimated. The topology of the underlying network can be directed and hierarchical. Some simple criteria are given to judge whether the tracking control can be successful. In addition, numerical examples are given to show the validity of the analytical results.

[1]  F. Zou,et al.  Bifurcation and chaos in cellular neural networks , 1993 .

[2]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  DYNAMIC CONSENSUS FOR MOBILE NETWORKS , 2005 .

[3]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[4]  Albert C. J. Luo,et al.  A theory for synchronization of dynamical systems , 2009 .

[5]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms , 1972, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Zhixin Ma,et al.  Double delayed feedback control for the stabilization of unstable steady states in chaotic systems , 2009 .

[7]  Jianfeng Lu,et al.  Generalized (complete, lag, anticipated) synchronization of discrete-time chaotic systems , 2008 .

[8]  Jinde Cao,et al.  Adaptive complete synchronization of two identical or different chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with fully unknown parameters. , 2005, Chaos.

[9]  Tianping Chen,et al.  Pinning Complex Networks by a Single Controller , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[10]  V. I. Krinsky,et al.  Image processing using light-sensitive chemical waves , 1989, Nature.

[11]  Tianping Chen,et al.  New approach to synchronization analysis of linearly coupled ordinary differential systems , 2006 .

[12]  Tianping Chen,et al.  Synchronization of coupled connected neural networks with delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[13]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[15]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[16]  Marios M. Polycarpou,et al.  Stability analysis of M-dimensional asynchronous swarms with a fixed communication topology , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[17]  Jinde Cao,et al.  Adaptive synchronization of neural networks with or without time-varying delay. , 2006, Chaos.

[18]  C. Wu Synchronization in networks of nonlinear dynamical systems coupled via a directed graph , 2005 .

[19]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  New criteria for synchronization stability of general complex dynamical networks with coupling delays , 2006 .

[20]  Roy,et al.  Communication with chaotic lasers , 1998, Science.

[21]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Stability analysis of swarms , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[22]  N. G. Rambidi,et al.  Image processing using light-sensitive chemical waves , 2002 .

[23]  Nancy A. Lynch,et al.  Distributed Algorithms , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[24]  Jinde Cao,et al.  Topology influences performance in the associative memory neural networks , 2006 .

[25]  Yoram Moses,et al.  A Layered Analysis of Consensus , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..

[26]  Frank C. Hoppensteadt,et al.  Pattern recognition via synchronization in phase-locked loop neural networks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[27]  Luc Moreau,et al.  Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[28]  Wei Ren,et al.  Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[29]  Xiang Li,et al.  Pinning a complex dynamical network to its equilibrium , 2004, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap..

[30]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Synchronization in uncertain complex networks. , 2006, Chaos.

[31]  Long Wang,et al.  Virtual Leader Approach to Coordinated Control of Multiple Mobile Agents with Asymmetric Interactions , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[32]  Chai Wah Wu,et al.  Synchronization in Coupled Chaotic Circuits and Systems , 2002 .

[33]  Manfredi Maggiore,et al.  State Agreement for Continuous-Time Coupled Nonlinear Systems , 2007, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[34]  Daniel W. C. Ho,et al.  Pinning Stabilization of Linearly Coupled Stochastic Neural Networks via Minimum Number of Controllers , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[35]  Peng Yang,et al.  Stability and Convergence Properties of Dynamic Average Consensus Estimators , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[36]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[37]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[38]  T. Carroll,et al.  MASTER STABILITY FUNCTIONS FOR SYNCHRONIZED COUPLED SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[39]  O. Taussky A Recurring Theorem on Determinants , 1949 .

[40]  Felipe Cucker,et al.  Emergent Behavior in Flocks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[41]  J. Bauer,et al.  Chemical reaction network theory for in-silico biologists , 2003 .