Cross sectional survey of socioeconomic variations in severity and mechanism of childhood injuries in Trent 1992-7

Abstract Objective: To determine the relation between morbidity from injury and deprivation for different levels of injury severity and for different injury mechanisms for children aged 0-14 years. Design: Cross sectional survey of routinely collected hospital admission data for injury 1992-7. Setting: 862 electoral wards in Trent Region. Subjects: 21 587 injury related hospital admissions for children aged 0-4 years and 35 042 admissions for children aged 5-14. Main outcome measures: Rate ratios for hospital admission for all injuries, all injuries involving long bone fracture, and all injuries involving long bone fracture requiring an operation; rate ratios for hospital admission for six types of injury mechanism divided by quintiles of the electoral wards' Townsend scores for deprivation. Rate ratios calculated by Poisson regression, with adjustment for distance from nearest hospital admitting patients with injuries, rurality, ethnicity, and percentage of males in each electoral ward. Results: Both total number of admissions for injury and admissions for injuries of higher severity increased with increasing socioeconomic deprivation. These gradients were more marked for 0-4 year old children than 5-14 year olds. In terms of injury mechanisms, the steepest socioeconomic gradients (where the rate for the fifth of electoral wards with the highest deprivation scores was ≥3 times that of the fifth with the lowest scores) were for pedestrian injuries (adjusted rate ratio 3.65 (95% confidence interval 2.94 to 4.54)), burns and scalds (adjusted rate ratio 3.49 (2.81 to 4.34)), and poisoning (adjusted rate ratio 2.98 (2.65 to 3.34)). Conclusion: There are steep socioeconomic gradients for injury morbidity including the most common mechanisms of injury. This has implications for targeting injury prevention interventions and resources. What is already known on this topic? There is a steep socioeconomic gradient for injury related mortality There is conflicting evidence regarding the socioeconomic gradient for injury morbidity, particularly with respect to different injury severity and injury mechanisms What this study adds A socioeconomic gradient for injury morbidity exists in children aged <15 years, particularly in those aged <5, which persist for different measures of injury severity The socioeconomic gradient for injury mechanisms is steepest for pedestrian injuries, burns and scalds, and poisoning, which has implications for targeting injury prevention strategies

[1]  S. Logan,et al.  Patterns of unintentional injury in childhood and their relation to socio-economic factors. , 1999, Public Health.

[2]  M. Mckee,et al.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit? , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.

[3]  T. Beattie,et al.  Socioeconomic status and adolescent injuries. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[4]  D. Kendrick Accidental injury attendances as predictors of future admission. , 1993, Journal of public health medicine.

[5]  C Power,et al.  Does the decline in child injury mortality vary by social class? A comparison of class specific mortality in 1981 and 1991 , 1996, BMJ.

[6]  C. Mckee,et al.  Accident and emergency attendance rates: variation among patients from different general practices. , 1990, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Measuring severity of injuries to children from home accidents. , 1989, Archives of disease in childhood.

[8]  R. Alwash,et al.  Accidents in the home among children under 5: ethnic differences or social disadvantage? , 1988, British medical journal.

[9]  R. Reading,et al.  Equity in the NHS Monitoring and promoting equity in primary and secondary care , 1994, BMJ.

[10]  D. Gorman,et al.  Using routine accident and emergency department data to describe local injury epidemiology. , 1999, Public health.

[11]  R. Lyons,et al.  Injury surveillance in children--usefulness of a centralised database of accident and emergency attendances. , 1995, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[12]  R. Hayes,et al.  Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Assessment of the reproducibility of clinical coding in routinely collected hospital activity data: a study in two hospitals. , 1998, Journal of public health medicine.

[14]  J D Langley,et al.  Why the government was right to change the 'Our Healthier Nation' accidental injury target. , 2000, Public health.

[15]  A. Walker,et al.  A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.

[16]  R. Gratz Accidental injury in childhood: a literature review on pediatric trauma. , 1979, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  R. Lyons,et al.  Incidence of childhood fractures in affluent and deprived areas: population based study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  E. Towner,et al.  Annual incidence of unintentional injury among 54,000 children. , 1996, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[19]  I. Leck,et al.  The Black report , 1990, BMJ.

[20]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health. , 1989, BMJ.

[21]  I. Roberts,et al.  Cause specific social class mortality differentials for child injury and poisoning in England and Wales. , 1997, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[22]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  Socio‐economic status and childhood injuries , 1983, Australian paediatric journal.

[23]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Measuring the frequency of "severe" accidental injury in childhood. , 1992, Journal of epidemiology and community health.