Factors associated with adherence to follow-up calls in cancer patients receiving care at a community oncology practice

Background Follow-up calls in the oncology setting are frequently used to augment care and encourage oral antineoplastic adherence. However, limited data are available on patient populations that would benefit from this intervention versus populations that may require alternative interventions. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics among patients on oral antineoplastic agents that influence their likelihood to respond to follow-up calls. Methods Patients receiving care from one of the eight community oncology clinics within the same branch were analyzed. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years, received a new oral antineoplastic agent that was electronically prescribed between August 2018–October 2018, and picked up their first fill from their pharmacy of choice. Patients received up to six follow-up calls after picking up their first prescription. Calls were categorized as adherent (≥3 monthly interactions) or non-adherent (<3 monthly interactions). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with follow-up call adherence. Factors included demographics, cancer stage, marital status, employment, pharmacy setting (internal pharmacy versus external pharmacy), and insurance used by the patient. Descriptive analysis was performed to analyze response rates, cancer diagnosis, and to determine the best time and day patients responded to follow-up calls. Results Data from 125 patients were analyzed, of which 65 patients (52%) were adherent to follow-up calls and the mean response rate over six months was 45% (range: 35% -- 54%). High success rates for follow-up calls were seen between 12–3 pm and on Tuesdays and Thursdays. After adjusting for covariates, patients with stage III-IV were 89% less likely to respond to follow-up calls compared to those with stage 0-II (95% CI: 0.02–0.64; p = 0.01), patients with commercial insurance were 79% less likely to adhere to follow-up calls compared to those on government insurance (95% CI: 0.06-0.71; p = 0.01), and patients using an external pharmacy had a 2.8 times increase odds of being adherent (95% CI 0.98-8.34; p = 0.05). All other factors were not significant. Conclusions For patients taking oral antineoplastics, non-adherence to follow-up calls was observed in more than 45% of patients receiving care from a community oncology clinic. Findings demonstrated that those with advanced stages of cancer, on commercial insurance, and going to an internal pharmacy were at higher risk for not adhering to follow up calls. Therefore, alternative methods for managing adherence and side effects in these populations are warranted.

[1]  T. Dieterle,et al.  Does a tailored intervention to promote adherence in patients with chronic lung disease affect exacerbations? A randomized controlled trial , 2019, Respiratory research.

[2]  C. Sonetto,et al.  Systematic Review of adverse events reporting in clinical trials leading to approval of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. , 2019, Future oncology.

[3]  M. Hussein,et al.  The Effect of Telephone-Based Follow-Up on Adherence, Efficacy, and Toxicity of Oral Capecitabine-Based Chemotherapy. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[4]  Conor Linehan,et al.  A systematic review of tailored eHealth interventions for weight loss , 2019, Digital health.

[5]  Hannah Wood,et al.  The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment , 2018, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  L. Nazer,et al.  The impact of pharmacist telephone calls after discharge on satisfaction of oncology patients: A randomized controlled study , 2018, Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners.

[7]  J. Polesel,et al.  Targeted therapies and adverse drug reactions in oncology: the role of clinical pharmacist in pharmacovigilance , 2018, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[8]  Dionne A. Graham,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials That Evaluate the Effectiveness of Hospital-Initiated Postdischarge Interventions on Hospital Readmission , 2017, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[9]  B. Given,et al.  Oral Anticancer Agents: An intervention to promote medication adherence and symptom management , 2017, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[10]  J. Cleland,et al.  Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure , 2016, Heart.

[11]  A. Shields,et al.  Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature , 2016, Patient preference and adherence.

[12]  L. Petersen,et al.  Improving Oral Oncolytic Patient Self-Management. , 2016, Journal of oncology practice.

[13]  K. McConnell,et al.  Comparison of Low-Value Care in Medicaid vs Commercially Insured Populations. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[14]  Marc Fleming,et al.  A Pharmacist Telephone Intervention to Identify Adherence Barriers and Improve Adherence Among Nonadherent Patients with Comorbid Hypertension and Diabetes in a Medicare Advantage Plan , 2016, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[15]  J. Tipton Overview of the challenges related to oral agents for cancer and their impact on adherence. , 2015, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[16]  P. Burhenn,et al.  Using tools and technology to promote education and adherence to oral agents for cancer. , 2015, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[17]  Wen-Lieng Lee,et al.  Factors associated with gender differences in medication adherence: a longitudinal study. , 2014, Journal of advanced nursing.

[18]  C. Jones Medication adherence study looks at types of interventions. , 2014, Managed care.

[19]  K. Davis,et al.  Medicare versus private insurance: rhetoric and reality. , 2002, Health affairs.

[20]  D. Juárez,et al.  Interventions to increase medication adherence in African-American and Latino populations: a literature review. , 2014, Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health.

[21]  G. Bhattacharyya Oral systemic therapy: Not all “win-win” , 2010, Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology.