Scene coherence can affect the local response to natural images in human V1

Neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) can be indirectly affected by visual stimulation positioned outside their receptive fields. Although this contextual modulation has been intensely studied, we have little notion of how it manifests with naturalistic stimulation. Here, we investigated how the V1 response to a natural image fragment is affected by spatial context that is consistent or inconsistent with the scene from which it was extracted. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T, we measured the blood oxygen level‐dependent signal in human V1 (n = 8) while participants viewed an array of apertures. Most apertures showed fragments from a single scene, yielding a dominant perceptual interpretation which participants were asked to categorize, and the remaining apertures each showed fragments drawn from a set of 20 scenes. We find that the V1 response was significantly increased for apertures showing image structure that was coherent with the dominant scene relative to the response to the same image structure when it was non‐coherent. Additional analyses suggest that this effect was mostly evident for apertures in the periphery of the visual field, that it peaked towards the centre of the aperture, and that it peaked in the middle to superficial regions of the cortical grey matter. These findings suggest that knowledge of typical spatial relationships is embedded in the circuitry of contextual modulation. Such mechanisms, possibly augmented by contributions from attentional factors, serve to increase the local V1 activity under conditions of contextual consistency.

[1]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Two-dimensional mapping of the central and parafoveal visual field to human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Damien J. Mannion,et al.  Consequences of polar form coherence for fMRI responses in human visual cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Kathleen A. Hansen,et al.  Topographic Organization in and near Human Visual Area V4 , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Multiple components of surround modulation in primary visual cortex: Multiple neural circuits with multiple functions? , 2014, Vision Research.

[11]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[12]  Brenna Argall,et al.  SUMA: an interface for surface-based intra- and inter-subject analysis with AFNI , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[13]  Hamutal Slovin,et al.  Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping , 2013, Neuron.

[14]  J. Allman,et al.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[16]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Layer-Specific fMRI Reflects Different Neuronal Computations at Different Depths in Human V1 , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  P. König,et al.  Cortical long-range interactions embed statistical knowledge of natural sensory input: a voltage-sensitive dye imaging study. , 2013, F1000Research.

[18]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Cortical Surround Interactions and Perceptual Salience via Natural Scene Statistics , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Andriana Olmos,et al.  A biologically inspired algorithm for the recovery of shading and reflectance images , 2004 .

[22]  Fuqiang Zhao,et al.  Cortical depth‐dependent gradient‐echo and spin‐echo BOLD fMRI at 9.4T , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[24]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[26]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  The development and use of phase-encoded functional MRI designs , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Damien J. Mannion,et al.  Regions of Mid-level Human Visual Cortex Sensitive to the Global Coherence of Local Image Patches , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  A Grinvald,et al.  In-vivo Optical Imaging of Cortical Architecture and Dynamics , 1999 .

[29]  G. Boynton,et al.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[32]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Touryan,et al.  Contextual modulation of orientation tuning contributes to efficient processing of natural stimuli , 2005, Network.

[34]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[36]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[37]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.