3D Printing of a Leaf Spring: A Demonstration of Closed-Loop Control in Additive Manufacturing

3D printing is rapidly becoming a commodity. However, the quality of the printed parts is not always even nor predictable. Feedback control is demonstrated during the printing of a plastic object using additive manufacturing as a means to improve macroscopic mechanical properties of the object. The printed object is a leaf spring made of several parts of different infill density values, which are the control variables in this problem. In order to achieve a desired objective stiffness, measurements are taken after each part is completed and the infill density is adjusted accordingly in a closed-loop framework. With feedback control, the absolute error of the measured part stiffness is reduced from 11.63% to 1.34% relative to the specified stiffness. This experiment is therefore a proof of concept to show the relevance of using feedback control in additive manufacturing. By considering the printing process and the measurements as stochastic processes, we show how stochastic optimal control and Kalman filtering can be used to improve the quality of objects manufactured with rudimentary printers.

[1]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[2]  David W. Rosen,et al.  A Brief History of Additive Manufacturing and the 2009 Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing: Looking Back and Looking Ahead , 2009 .

[3]  Shawn P. Moylan,et al.  Measurement Science Needs for Real-time Control of Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion Processes , 2015 .

[4]  M. Athans.  On the Determination of Optimal Costly Measurement Strategies for Linear Stochastic Systems , 1972 .

[5]  Yong Huang,et al.  Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations , 2015 .

[6]  Michael Athans,et al.  1972 IFAC congress paper: On the determination of optimal costly measurement strategies for linear stochastic systems , 1972 .

[7]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  3D printer selection: A decision-making evaluation and ranking model , 2013 .

[8]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Exploiting Additive Manufacturing Infill in Topology Optimization for Improved Buckling Load , 2016 .

[9]  Metin Ersoy,et al.  Chassis handbook : fundamentals, driving dynamics, components, mechatronics, perspectives , 2011 .

[10]  W. Brockett,et al.  Minimum attention control , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Charlie C. L. Wang,et al.  The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering , 2015, Comput. Aided Des..

[12]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Infill Optimization for Additive Manufacturing—Approaching Bone-Like Porous Structures , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Vikram Krishnamurthy,et al.  Algorithms for optimal scheduling and management of hidden Markov model sensors , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Guangjun Zhang,et al.  Adaptive control of deposited height in GMAW-based layer additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[15]  John D. Bernardin,et al.  A Framework for Additive Manufacturing Process Monitoring & Control , 2017 .

[16]  William E. Frazier,et al.  Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[17]  S. Raman,et al.  A design for the additive manufacture of functionally graded porous structures with tailored mechanical properties for biomedical applications , 2011 .