Objective To estimate the effect of the 2005 Victorian mandatory personal flotation device (PFD) wearing regulations on PFD use by occupants of small (hull length ≤4.8 m) power recreational vessels. Design Before-after observational study investigating the probability of PFD use among occupants of small vessels before and after the regulations were introduced compared with the probability of use by their counterparts on large power vessels (hull length >4.8–12 m) who were not required to wear PFDs before or after the regulations were introduced in the low-risk conditions in which observations occurred. Methods Statewide observation surveys of boaters were conducted in peak boating periods between January and March 2005 (prelegislation) and 2007 (postlegislation). Data collection included size of vessel, age and sex of boaters, life jacket use, boat type, activity of boaters, type of waterway and weather and water conditions. Logistic regression modelling tested whether there were statistically significant differences in the change in the relative odds of occupants wearing PFDs from the preintervention to the postintervention period in small compared with large power recreational vessels. Results The probability of PFD use increased from 22% to 63% on small power vessels compared with 12% to 13% on large vessels. Regression analysis showed a high statistically significant increase in the odds of PFD use on small vessels relative to large vessels (OR 6.2, 95% CI 4.2 to 9.3, p<0.001). No statistically significant effect on use on large vessels was associated with the regulation (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.70, p=0.15). Relative to large vessels, on small vessels the odds of PFD use increased significantly in both sexes, all age groups, all vessel types and activity groupings except for towed water sports where the increase was only marginally statistically significant. Conclusions The legislative intervention was successful in increasing PFD wearing in small vessels. However, visible enforcement and tougher penalties are needed to optimise compliance.
[1]
C. Treser,et al.
Personal Floatation Device Usage: Do Educational Efforts Have an Impact?
,
1997,
Journal of public health policy.
[2]
O. C. Laosse,et al.
Drowning--United States, 2005-2009.
,
2012,
MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.
[3]
A P Vulcan,et al.
Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria, Australia--an evaluation.
,
1994,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[4]
Allan F Williams,et al.
The role of enforcement programs in increasing seat belt use.
,
2004,
Journal of safety research.
[5]
Beth E Ebel,et al.
Informing policy on open water drowning prevention: an observational survey of life jacket use in Washington state
,
2014,
Injury Prevention.
[6]
Erin Cassell,et al.
Effectiveness of the 2005 compulsory personal flotation device (PFD) wearing regulations in reducing drowning deaths among recreational boaters in Victoria, Australia
,
2014,
Injury Prevention.
[7]
P. Cummings,et al.
Association between wearing a personal floatation device and death by drowning among recreational boaters: a matched cohort analysis of United States Coast Guard data
,
2010,
Injury Prevention.
[8]
B. Hagel,et al.
Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: a systematic review
,
2006,
Injury Prevention.
[9]
P Cummings,et al.
Are life vests worn? A multiregional observational study of personal flotation device use in small boats
,
1998,
Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.