Clinical status and dependency of the elderly requiring long-term care in Japan.

More than 4 million of the elderly receive long-term care services using the public long-term care insurance in Japan. In order to use the insurance system, the insured person needs to be classified in one of the six care levels according to his/her clinical status. Though each level is defined in terms of the total amount of estimated care time needed per day, the clinical status of each level is not precisely defined. This study aimed to compare the clinical status of the six levels in order to suggest indicators of deterioration for each care level. We analyzed the clinical status for 7,222 cases who applied for care-need certification in a rural area of Japan. Sixty-seven items were used to determine physical function, activities of daily living, and cognitive and sensory status. Even in the mildest care level (Support Required), more than 50% of the individuals were dependent with regard to standing and sitting, while weakness of the lower extremities and dependency in walking were identified in Care Level 1, dependency in dressing and toilet habits in Care Level 2, dependency in grooming and transferring in Care Level 3, dependency in communication and feeding in Care Level 4, and dependency in swallowing, orientation and limitations of joint movement in Care Level 5. Care providers should be tracking these changes to estimate and prevent the decline of care level because more than 20% of the individuals assessed in 2004 belonged to the worse care level one year later.

[1]  Naoto Endo,et al.  Report on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association’s 3-year project observing hip fractures at fixed-point hospitals , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[2]  Kazutoshi Nakamura,et al.  Health characteristics of elderly Japanese requiring care at home. , 2005, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  Takako Tsutsui,et al.  Care‐Needs Certification in the Long‐Term Care Insurance System of Japan , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  A. Takeda,et al.  Are there inequities in the assessment of dementia under Japan's LTC insurance system? , 2003, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[5]  K. Arisawa,et al.  Lower-extremity muscle forces measured by a hand-held dynamometer and the risk of falls among day-care users in Japan: using multinomial logistic regression analysis , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[6]  Hiroto Ito,et al.  Are the care levels of people with dementia correctly assessed for eligibility of the Japanese long‐term care insurance? , 2001, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[7]  T. Ozawa,et al.  IMPROVEMENT EN SELF‐CARE MAY LOWER THE INCREASING RATE OF MEDICAL EXPENSES FOR COMMUNITY‐DWELLING OLDER PEOPLE IN JAPAN , 1998, Journal of The American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Atoz Okamoto Need Assessment of Visiting Nursing and Rehabilitation Services for Noninstitutionalized Elderly , 1997, Journal of aging and health.

[9]  D. Dunlop,et al.  Disability in activities of daily living: patterns of change and a hierarchy of disability. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[10]  S. Travis,et al.  Simple counts of the number of basic ADL dependencies for long-term care research and practice. , 1990, Health services research.

[11]  Kazutoshi Nakamura,et al.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and activities of daily living in noninstitutionalized elderly Japanese requiring care , 2005, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.