Highly cited non-journal publications in political science, economics and psychology: a first exploration

In this study we show that it is possible to identify top-cited publications other than Web of Science (WoS) publications, particularly non-journal publications, within fields in the social and behavioral sciences. We analyzed references in publications that were themselves highly cited, with at least one European address. Books represent between 62 (psychology) and 81% (political science) of the non-WoS references, journal articles 15–24%. Books (economics, political science) and manuals (psychology) account for the most highly cited publications. Between 50 (psychology, political science) and 71% (economics) of the top-ranked most cited publications originated from the US versus between 18 (economics) and 38% (psychology) from Europe. Finally, it is discussed how the methods and procedures of the study can be optimized.

[1]  Jennifer Thompson,et al.  The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship , 2002 .

[2]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[3]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[5]  Linda Butler,et al.  Extending citation analysis to non-source items , 2006, Scientometrics.

[6]  Julian Warner,et al.  The Role of monographs in scholarly Communication: an Empirical Study of Philosophy, Sociology and Economics , 1996, J. Documentation.

[7]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible , 2006, Scientometrics.

[8]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  The weight of author self-citations , 2005 .

[10]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[11]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[12]  H. Moed.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[13]  A. Raan.  Measuring Science: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues , 2004 .

[14]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine , 2001 .

[15]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Policy impact of bibliometric rankings of research performance of departments and individuals in economics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[16]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  A. Nederhof.  Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity. , 1989 .

[19]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.

[20]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[21]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.