Interactive registration between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography using band-height images

In computed tomographic colonography (CTC), a patient is commonly scanned twice including supine and prone scans to improve the sensitivity of polyp detection. Typically, a radiologist must manually match the corresponding areas in the supine and prone CT scans, which is a difficult and time-consuming task, even for experienced scan readers. In this paper, we propose a method of supine-prone registration utilizing band-height images, which are directly constructed from the CT scans using a ray-casting algorithm containing neighboring shape information. In our method, we first identify anatomical feature points and establish initial correspondences using local extreme points on centerlines. We then correct correspondences using band-height images that contain neighboring shape information. We use geometrical and image-based information to match positions between the supine and prone centerlines. Finally, our algorithm searches the correspondence of user input points using the matched anatomical feature point pairs as key points and band-height images. The proposed method achieved accurate matching and relatively faster processing time than other previously proposed methods. The mean error of the matching between the supine and prone points for uniformly sampled positions was 18.41±22.07mm in 20 CTC datasets. The average pre-processing time was 62.9±8.6s, and the interactive matching was performed in nearly real-time. Our supine-prone registration method is expected to be helpful for the accurate and fast diagnosis of polyps.

[1]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Intra-patient colon surface registration based on t&tildeae;ni&tildeae; coli , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Beom Jin Park,et al.  Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography , 2009, European Radiology.

[3]  S. Park,et al.  Simethicone to prevent colonic bubbles during CT colonography performed with polyethylene glycol lavage and iohexol tagging: a randomized clinical trial. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Nicholas Petrick,et al.  Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study. , 2007, Radiology.

[5]  S. Dogramadzi,et al.  Computer controlled colonoscopy , 1998, IMTC/98 Conference Proceedings. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Where Instrumentation is Going (Cat. No.98CH36222).

[6]  Marc Modat,et al.  Registration of the endoluminal surfaces of the colon derived from prone and supine CT colonography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Display of surfaces from volume data , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  F. Netter Atlas of Human Anatomy , 1967 .

[9]  H. Hoppe,et al.  Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Registration of central paths and colonic polyps between supine and prone scans in computed tomography colonography: pilot study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  C. Destrieux,et al.  Anatomical study of the length of the human intestine , 2002, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[15]  S Halligan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Intra-patient Prone to Supine Colon Registration for Synchronized Virtual Colonoscopy , 2002, MICCAI.

[17]  Dirk Bartz,et al.  Virtual voyage: interactive navigation in the human colon , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon Robust registration of 2D and 3D point sets , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[19]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Byeong-Seok Shin,et al.  Fast path planning in virtual colonoscopy , 2008, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[21]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Supine and Prone Colon Registration Using Quasi-Conformal Mapping , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Arie E. Kaufman,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy , 2005, CACM.

[24]  C. G. Coin,et al.  Computerized radiology of the colon: a potential screening technique. , 1983, Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society.

[25]  Christopher L. Wyatt,et al.  Deformable Registration of Supine and Prone Colons for Computed Tomographic Colonography , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Reconstruction and visualization of 3D models of colonic surface , 1997 .

[28]  Frans Vos,et al.  Improved visualization in virtual colonoscopy using image-based rendering , 2001, VisSym.

[29]  S. Park,et al.  Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality , 2015, European Radiology.

[30]  A. Hara,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. , 1997, Radiology.

[31]  Yeong-Gil Shin,et al.  Fold-Preserving Electronic Cleansing Using a Reconstruction Model Integrating Material Fractions and Structural Responses , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  S. Napel,et al.  Medial axis registration of supine and prone CT colonography data , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  R. Truyen,et al.  Feasibility of automated matching of supine and prone CT-colonography examinations. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[34]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Matching 3-D Prone and Supine CT Colonography Scans Using Graphs , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[35]  Masahiro Oda,et al.  Haustral fold registration in CT colonography and its application to registration of virtual stretched view of the colon , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[36]  S D Wall,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[37]  A. Aschoff,et al.  CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps , 2005, European Radiology.

[38]  M. Ulla,et al.  Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions , 2007, Abdominal Imaging.

[39]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Endoluminal surface registration for CT colonography using haustral fold matching☆ , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[40]  M. Morrin,et al.  Screening virtual colonoscopy--ready for prime time? , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Registration of prone and supine CT colonography scans using correlation optimized warping and canonical correlation analysis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[42]  Christopher L. Wyatt,et al.  Registration of prone and supine colons in the presence of topological changes , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[43]  J. Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography using 360° virtual dissection : A feasibility study , 2006 .