Population psychology: a new look at an old problem.

On the basis of a theoretical model developed by Fishbein it was predicted that an individuals intention to engage in a specific family planning behavior is a function of 2 components: ones beliefs regarding the consequences of performing that behavior multiplied by the evaluation of those consequences; and ones normative beliefs multiplied by ones motivation to comply with those perceived notions. The study subjects consisted of a stratified random sample of 270 women residing in Urbana-Champaign Illinois. These currently married white women ranging in age from 18-38 years were stratified in terms of 3 levels of socioeconomic status (SES) and 2 levels of religious affiliation (Catholic and Protestant). Subjects were administered a questionnaire assessing the models components for 3 family planning behaviors--having a 2 child family having a child during the next 2 years and using oral contraceptives. For the total sample the model provided highly accurate prediction of family planning intentions. The high multiple correlations of the models components with behavioral intention (BI) observed within each of the major subsamples indicated that for the prediction of family planning intentions the model is most likely generalizable to the majority of the American population. The models predictability was unaffected by such factors as SES level of education or religion. As predicted by Fishbeins model there was evidence that an individuals attitude toward performing each of the 3 behaviors was highly correlated with the beliefs about the consequences of performing the behavior and the evaluations of these consequences. The superiority of specific attitude measures in predicting BI was demonstrated in the data. In sum the investigation indicated that fertility-related intentions may be understood in terms of the theoretical model of BI.

[1]  A. Davidson,et al.  The Prediction of Family Planning Intentions , 1974 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. , 1973 .

[3]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment , 1973 .

[4]  M Fishbein,et al.  Theoretical and methodological considerations in the prediction of family planning intentions and behavior. , 1973, Representative research in social psychology.

[5]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  A test of a model for reducing measured attitude-behavior discrepancies. , 1972 .

[6]  M. Fishbein Toward an Understanding of Family Planning Behaviors , 1972 .

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables , 1970 .

[8]  N. Ryder,et al.  UNITED STATES: The Papal Encyclical and Catholic Practice and Attitudes, 1969 , 1970 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The Prediction of Behavioral Intentions in a Choice Situation. , 1969 .

[10]  F. Nye,et al.  Class And Conformity , 1969 .

[11]  M. B. Jones Correlation as a dependent variable. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Readings in attitude theory and measurement , 1968 .

[13]  R. Darlington,et al.  Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[15]  P. K. Whelpton,et al.  Fertility and Family Planning in the United States , 1966 .

[16]  H. Triandis EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSES OF THE BEHAVIORAL COMPONENT OF SOCIAL ATTITUDES. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  M. Fishbein An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward that Object , 1963 .

[18]  Donald N. Barrett,et al.  Research in Family Planning. , 1963 .

[19]  W. Petersen,et al.  Family Growth in Metropolitan America. , 1961 .

[20]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  P. K. Whelpton,et al.  Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility. , 1954 .