Diagnostic Accuracy of an iPhone DICOM Viewer for the Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee

Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of viewing magnetic resonance (MR) images on a handheld mobile device compared with a conventional radiology workstation for the diagnosis of intra-articular knee pathology. Design:Prospective comparison study. Setting:Tertiary care center. Patients:Fifty consecutive subjects who had MR imaging of the knee followed by knee arthroscopy were prospectively evaluated. Interventions:Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed each MR study using 2 different viewers: the OsiriX DICOM viewer software on an Apple iPhone 3GS device and eFilm Workstation software on a conventional picture archiving and communications system workstation. Main Outcome Measures:Sensitivity and specificity of the iPhone and workstation interpretations was performed using knee arthroscopy as the reference standard. Intraobserver concordance and agreement between the iPhone and workstation interpretations were determined. Results:There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 devices for each paired comparison of diagnostic performance. For the iPhone interpretations, sensitivity ranged from 77% (13 of 17) for the lateral meniscus to 100% (17 of 17) for the anterior cruciate ligament. Specificity ranged from 74% (14 of 19) for cartilage to 100% (50 of 50) for the posterior cruciate ligament. There was a very high level of interobserver and intraobserver agreement between devices and readers. The iPhone reads took longer than the corresponding workstation reads, with a significant mean difference between the iPhone and workstation reads of 3.98 minutes (P < 0.001). Conclusions:The diagnostic performance of interpreting MR images on a handheld mobile device for the assessment of intra-articular knee pathology is similar to that of a conventional radiology workstation, however, requires a longer viewing time. Clinical Relevance:Timely and accurate interpretation of complex medical images using mobile device solutions could result in new workflow efficiencies and ultimately improve patient care.

[1]  Mark Simpson,et al.  iPhone-Based Teleradiology for the Diagnosis of Acute Cervico-Dorsal Spine Trauma , 2010, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[2]  M. Goyal,et al.  Dramatically Reducing Imaging-to-Recanalization Time in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Making Choices , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  R. Marx,et al.  Multirater Agreement of Arthroscopic Grading of Knee Articular Cartilage , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  M G Myriam Hunink,et al.  MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. , 2003, Radiology.

[5]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[6]  S. F. Quinn,et al.  Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging versus arthroscopy: how reliable a standard is arthroscopy? , 1991, Radiology.

[7]  James R. Stone,et al.  Handheld Device Review of Abdominal CT for the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Bart M. Demaerschalk,et al.  Smartphone Teleradiology Application Is Successfully Incorporated Into a Telestroke Network Environment , 2012, Stroke.

[9]  R. Marx,et al.  Multirater Agreement of Arthroscopic Meniscal Lesions , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  D. Dahm,et al.  MRI accuracy for tears of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament injury and the clinical relevance of missed tears. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R. Talanow,et al.  Radiation passport: an iPhone and iPod touch application to track radiation dose and estimate associated cancer risks. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Smartphone Apps for Orthopaedic Surgeons , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  Sandeep Bhuta,et al.  Utility of Radiopaedia iPhone Application as a Self-directed Learning Tool for Continuing Professional Development , 2010 .

[15]  B. Dala-ali,et al.  The uses of the iPhone for surgeons. , 2011, The Surgeon.

[16]  Pieter L. Kubben,et al.  Neurosurgical apps for iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad and Android , 2010, Surgical neurology international.

[17]  M J Tapiovaara,et al.  Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  David G. Armstrong,et al.  FaceTime for Physicians: Using Real Time Mobile Phone–Based Videoconferencing to Augment Diagnosis and Care in Telemedicine , 2011, Eplasty.

[19]  John S. Luo.  Medical Applications for the iPhone , 2009 .

[20]  I. Lizasoain,et al.  A Mouse Model of Hemorrhagic Transformation by Delayed Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration After In Situ Thromboembolic Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[21]  A. D. De Smet,et al.  Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic findings associated with failure to diagnose a lateral meniscal tear on knee MRI. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.