Transformations, regression geometry and R
暂无分享,去创建一个
In making a least-squares fit to a set of data, it is often advantageous to transform the response variable. This can lead to difficulties in making comparisons between competing transformations. Several definitions of R2 statistics have been suggested. These calculations mostly involve the actual and fitted values of the response, after the transformation has been inverted, or undone. Kvalseth (Amer. Statist. 39 (1985) 279) discussed the various R2 types and Scott and Wild (Amer. Statist. 45 (1991) 127) pointed out some of the problems that arise. In this paper, we examine such problems in a new way by considering the underlying regression geometry. This leads to a new suggestion for an R2 statistic based on the geometry, and to a statistic Q which is closely connected to the quality of the estimation of the transformation parameter.
[1] T. O. Kvålseth. Cautionary Note about R 2 , 1985 .
[2] Transformations and R 2 , 1991 .
[3] George C. Derringer. An empirical model for viscosity of filled and plasticized elastomer compounds , 1974 .
[4] Richard Anderson-Sprecher,et al. Model Comparisons and R 2 , 1994 .
[5] D. Cox,et al. An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .