Entrepreneurial orientation and SME performance across societal cultures: An international study

The concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) is universally applicable, and many empirical studies report a positive relationship between EO and performance in different national contexts. Empirical research, however, scarcely addresses which country-level contingencies affect the EO–performance link. Building on two second-order factors of societal culture—performance-based culture (PBC) and socially supportive culture (SSC)—the present study proposes and tests such a contingency framework. Using a data set of 1248 SMEs from seven national contexts, multilevel analyses show that PBC positively moderates the relationship between EO and performance, whereas SSC has no moderation effect.

[1]  E. Roberts,et al.  First-mover advantages in regimes of weak appropriability: the case of financial services innovations , 2002 .

[2]  R. Javalgi,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, management commitment, and human capital: The internationalization of SMEs in India , 2011 .

[3]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[4]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[5]  Danny Miller,et al.  Governance, Social Identity, and Entrepreneurial Orientation in Closely Held Public Companies , 2011 .

[6]  L. Uhlaner,et al.  Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship , 2010 .

[7]  Tomasz Mickiewicz,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, and Institutions: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship across Nations , 2013 .

[8]  Ekaterina Turkina,et al.  Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[9]  Bat Batjargal,et al.  The Effects of Network’s Structural Holes: Polycentric Institutions, Product Portfolio, and New Venture Growth in China and Russia , 2010 .

[10]  Stephen J. Carson,et al.  Uncertainty, Opportunism and Governance: The Effects of Volatility and Ambiguity on Formal and Relational Contracting , 2006 .

[11]  Thorsten Semrau,et al.  What drives the allocation of specific investments between buyer and supplier , 2015 .

[12]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[13]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach , 2005 .

[14]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The internationalization and performance of SMEs , 2001 .

[15]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation and the business performance of SMEs: a quantitative study from the Netherlands , 2012 .

[16]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies , 2004 .

[17]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Best-Practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Level Interaction Effects Using Multilevel Modeling , 2013 .

[18]  O. Andersen,et al.  Firms’ internationalization and alternative approaches to the international customer/market selection , 2002 .

[19]  Xin Lai,et al.  A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects of Common Method Variance on Significance Testing and Parameter Bias in Hierarchical Linear Modeling , 2013 .

[20]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors , 2013 .

[21]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[22]  William P. Wan,et al.  Country Resource Environments, Firm Capabilities, and Corporate Diversification Strategies , 2005 .

[23]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–Performance Relationship , 2014 .

[24]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Distance and Perceptions of Risk in Internationalization Decisions , 2015 .

[26]  William J. Wales,et al.  Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research , 2013 .

[27]  Patrick M. Kreiser,et al.  Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance , 2013 .

[28]  S. Kraus,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: joint product innovation and learning from allies , 2016 .

[29]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[30]  G. Willard,et al.  Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms , 1990 .

[31]  G. Lumpkin,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct , 2011 .

[32]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[33]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research , 2008 .

[34]  David A. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[35]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[36]  S. Sundqvist,et al.  The effects of country characteristics, cultural similarity and adoption timing on the diffusion of wireless communications , 2005 .

[37]  T. Elfring,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- And Extraindustry Social Capital , 2008 .

[38]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[39]  M. Frese,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future , 2009 .