Cumulative Sum Chart Modeled under the Presence of Outliers

Cumulative sum control charts that are based on the estimated control limits are extensively used in practice. Such control limits are often characterized by a Phase I estimation error. The presence of these errors can cause a change in the location and/or width of control limits resulting in a deprived performance of the control chart. In this study, we introduce a non-parametric Tukey’s outlier detection model in the design structure of a two-sided cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart with estimated parameters for process monitoring. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we studied the estimation effect on the performance of the CUSUM chart in terms of the average run length and the standard deviation of the run length. We found the new design structure is more stable in the presence of outliers and requires fewer amounts of Phase I observations to stabilize the run-length performance. Finally, a numerical example and practical application of the proposed scheme are demonstrated using a dataset from healthcare surveillance where received signal strength of individuals’ movement is the variable of interest. The implementation of classical CUSUM shows that a shift detection in Phase II that received signal strength data is indeed masked/delayed if there are outliers in Phase I data. On the contrary, the proposed chart omits the Phase I outliers and gives a timely signal in Phase II.

[1]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[2]  F. E. Grubbs Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples , 1969 .

[3]  R. H. Moore,et al.  Some Grubbs-Type Statistics for the Detection of Several Outliers , 1972 .

[4]  Raymond T. Ng,et al.  Distance-based outliers: algorithms and applications , 2000, The VLDB Journal.

[5]  Gemai Chen,et al.  THE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE RUN LENGTH DISTRIBUTION OF X̄ CHARTS WHEN CONTROL LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED Gemai Chen , 2003 .

[6]  Qi Wang,et al.  Random-data perturbation techniques and privacy-preserving data mining , 2005, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[7]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  The Run Length Distribution of the CUSUM with Estimated Parameters , 2004 .

[8]  Kun Liu,et al.  Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[9]  Eugenio K. Epprecht,et al.  Estimating the Standard Deviation in Quality-Control Applications , 2010 .

[10]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  Robust Location Estimators for the Ū Control Chart , 2011 .

[11]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  Robust CUSUM Control Charting , 2013 .

[12]  Mia Hubert,et al.  Detecting influential data points for the Hill estimator in Pareto-type distributions , 2013, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[13]  Bin Chen,et al.  A new exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[14]  N. Balakrishnan,et al.  Tests for Multiple Outliers in an Exponential Sample , 2014, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[15]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  Enhanced Cumulative Sum Charts for Monitoring Process Dispersion , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  Giovanni Celano,et al.  One-Sided Shewhart-type Charts for Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation in Short Production Runs , 2015 .

[17]  William H. Woodall,et al.  CUSUM charts with controlled conditional performance under estimated parameters , 2016 .

[18]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  A comparative study of memory‐type control charts under normal and contaminated normal environments , 2016, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[19]  Claudio Gallicchio,et al.  Human activity recognition using multisensor data fusion based on Reservoir Computing , 2016, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[20]  Giovanni Celano,et al.  A variable sampling interval Shewhart control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation in short production runs , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[21]  Philippe Castagliola,et al.  Run-sum control charts for monitoring the coefficient of variation , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  A. Ali,et al.  Performance evaluation of joint monitoring control charts , 2017 .

[23]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Ranked Set Sampling in Nonparametric CUSUM Control Charts , 2017, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[24]  Abdul Haq,et al.  Run sum chart for monitoring multivariate coefficient of variation , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[25]  Min Xie,et al.  Models and monitoring of zero‐inflated processes: The past and current trends , 2019, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[26]  Kim Phuc Tran,et al.  On the performance of VSI Shewhart control chart for monitoring the coefficient of variation in the presence of measurement errors , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.