Lexical Access of Function versus Content Words

There has been a simmering debate as to whether evidence exists for differential processes of lexical access for function and content words. This has centered around the frequency effect (higher word frequency reducing access times for content words but not function words). Previous work has used the lexical decision paradigm, which has been shown to reflect more than lexical access times. We measured naming times for words in sentences read for meaning. Our findings confirm that lexical access for function words is indeed faster than for content words as predicted by neurolinguistic theory and electrophysiological evidence, but that this difference can be attributed to word predictability (Cloze value) and word familiarity (log frequency). We also show that differences in frequency effect for the two word types holds only for the lower frequency words and not at all for the higher frequency words. We discuss the implications of the results for neurolinguistic theory.

[1]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[2]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Memory and control of action , 1983 .

[4]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity , 1982, Brain and Language.

[6]  E. Zurif,et al.  The Critical Role of Group Studies in Neuropsychology: Comprehension Regularities in Broca's Aphasia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[7]  M. Taft.  Lexical processing of functionally constrained words , 1990 .

[8]  H. Whitaker.  Towards A Brain Model of Automatization: A Short Essay , 1983 .

[9]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Event-Related Potential (ERP) Research in Neurolinguistics: Part I: Techniques and Applications to Lexical Access , 1998 .

[10]  D. Caplan,et al.  Biological studies of mental processes , 1981 .

[11]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: Frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence , 1985, Cognition.

[12]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A R Schmauder,et al.  Ability to stand alone and processing of open-class and closed-class words: isolation versus context. , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  Postaccess processes in the open vs. closed class distinction , 1989, Brain and Language.

[15]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Handbook of Neurolinguistics , 1998 .

[16]  Juan Segui,et al.  The word frequency effect and lexical access , 1982, Neuropsychologia.